Kamis, 02 Mei 2019

Sophie Turner wears jumpsuit at surprise Vegas wedding to Joe Jonas - Page Six

Sophie Turner married Joe Jonas in a surprise Las Vegas ceremony on Wednesday night, and her outfit was just as unconventional.

The “Game of Thrones” actress, 23, walked down the aisle to greet Jonas, 29, and their Elvis impersonator officiant wearing a white bridal jumpsuit by Ukranian brand Bevza and a matching veil.

The one-piece silk design features a deep V-neck, wide-leg silhouette and an elastic waistband, which no doubt kept the bride comfy as she danced to country duo Dan + Shay’s live performance of their hit song “Speechless.” The jumpsuit is currently available for pre-order and costs $648.

She paired the comfy set with gold Loeffler Randall mules ($395).

Sophie Turner in a Bevza bridal jumpsuit
Sophie Turner in a Bevza bridal jumpsuitInstagram; Bevza

Also present at A Little White Wedding Chapel were Joe’s bandmate brothers Nick and Kevin, who served as groomsmen wearing matching gray suits. The couple, who wed after the Billboard Music Awards, exchanged ring pops in place of wedding bands.

The couple got engaged in October 2017. Turner previously revealed that her “GoT” co-star Maisie Williams (who was absent from the Vegas nuptials) would be serving as one of two maids of honor, so it appears they will still have a second wedding in France as planned.

Perhaps Turner will pick a traditional gown the second time around — though it’s doesn’t seem likely for this spontaneous couple.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://pagesix.com/2019/05/02/sophie-turner-wears-jumpsuit-at-surprise-vegas-wedding-to-joe-jonas/

2019-05-02 16:27:00Z
CAIiEIjUrYM9YT5IRMgJVrFxNkIqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowmID5CjDdtOACMLzWtAU

Will Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Meet With Donald Trump? - The Cheat Sheet

It has recently been announced that Donald Trump will return to the United Kingdom for an official state visit.

This comes almost a year after his last trip across the pond, and many people are wondering whether the president will meet with any other royal family members aside from Queen Elizabeth.

More specifically, will the American Meghan Markle and her husband Prince Harry be in attendance? Here’s what we know.

Donald Trump is meeting with Queen Elizabeth in June

President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump | Pete Marovich/Getty Images

Unlike last year when Donald Trump came to the U.K. on a working visit, this time, it has been reported that Queen Elizabeth has invited Trump and his wife Melania to her country for an official state visit, which will include more formal events like a banquet.

Donald Trump’s trip will take place from June 3 to 5. This coincides closely with the 75th anniversary of D-Day on June 6, so the queen and the Trump couple will attend a ceremony in Portsmouth, England – a place that played an important role in the D-Day invasion.

Donald Trump will also meet with British Prime Minister Theresa May at her office on Downing Street. According to Theresa May, this visit would be an “opportunity to strengthen our already close relationship in areas such as trade, investment, security and defence, and to discuss how we can build on these ties in the years ahead.”

Will Meghan Markle and Prince Harry meet with Donald Trump?

It’s not uncommon for working royals to show up at an event or two when Queen Elizabeth meets with heads of state from other countries. However, right now, it seems unlikely that Meghan Markle will be there to greet Donald and Melania Trump.

Meghan Markle is American and would be invited to take part in the visit if this were another president, but she herself has actually been vocal about her distaste for Donald Trump ever since his presidential campaign. It’s not too surprising considering the fact that she is a feminist and is against many things that Trump stands for. She once called him “divisive” and “misogynistic.”

Furthermore, Meghan Markle is about to have her baby any day, so she can go on maternity leave for a few months. Of course, whether she will actually make use of the whole maternity leave period is something we can’t predict (after all, Meghan herself is a go-getter who works a lot), but the timing of Trump’s visit seems a bit too soon for Meghan to return to royal duties.

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is in the same boat as his wife and is not a fan of Donald Trump. A source once shared that Harry thinks Trump is “a serious threat to human rights.”

Additionally, in the 1990s, Trump apparently used to stalk Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, and even claim that he could have “nailed” her if he wanted to. As such, it might also be unlikely for Prince Harry to meet Donald Trump. He could choose to simply stay home with Meghan and their newborn child.

Will other royal family members meet with Donald Trump?

Of course, what we have to remember is that royal family members are not supposed to be affiliated with any political party. They must leave behind personal views and be good hosts to whoever is visiting, which is why Queen Elizabeth is continuing her tradition of having state visits with U.S. presidents even despite growing protests against Donald Trump.

However, it’s still unclear whether Prince Charles or Prince William will show up. During Trump’s last visit to the UK, both Charles and William refused to meet with him. Normally, Prince Charles would often accompany Queen Elizabeth, but the queen was by herself that time.

Aside from Trump being creepy toward Princess Diana a long time ago, he has done other offensive things to the royal family. For example, he blamed Prince William’s wife, Kate Middleton, when topless pictures of her sunbathing at a private residence were leaked to the press.

“Kate Middleton is great–but she shouldn’t be sunbathing in the nude–only herself to blame,” Trump tweeted. “Who wouldn’t take Kate’s picture and make lots of money if she does the nude sunbathing thing. Come on Kate!”

Nevertheless, the last time that Donald Trump came to the United Kingdom and people were whispering about how Charles and William were nowhere to be seen, the palace said: “This was not a state visit and the involvement of other members of the royal family would be different.”

Thus, we have reasons to believe that perhaps this time either Prince Charles or Prince William will put their dislike for Donald Trump at home and show up next to the queen with a smile on their face.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/will-meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-meet-with-donald-trump.html/

2019-05-02 15:55:55Z
52780280677718

Road to Endgame: 'Avengers: Endgame' is a Bold New Beginning (and Look Back) for the Marvel Cinematic Universe - /FILM

endgame runtime

(Welcome to Road to Endgame, where we revisit the first 22 movies of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and ask, “How did we get here?” In part 1 of our look at Avengers: Endgame: how the film sets up its breathtaking finale.)

It’s never too late for course-correction.

As Marvel has steamrolled its way through popular culture, its failings seem to matter less and less. For every middling entry like Thor: The Dark World, there’s a riotous follow-up like Thor: Ragnarok, which lampshades its series’ tropes, remixes its themes and kills-off existing characters it doesn’t know what to do with, effectively removing the former from canon. To borrow the parlance of sister-franchise Star Wars, “Let the past die. Kill it if you have to.” Though, what Star Wars: The Last Jedi understood about this approach (spoken and acted upon by the villain Kylo Ren) was, ironically, something Ragnarok understood as well, despite sweeping its predecessor under the rug: that failure undealt with can come back to haunt you, and that real growth and catharsis means learning from the past before moving on.

Spoilers for Avengers: Endgame begin here.

The Avengers are shackled by the past. The horrors they’ve seen, those they’ve failed to prevent, and even those they’ve committed themselves. Weeks after the events of Avengers: Infinity War, they search desperately for a way to undo Thanos’ devastation — a universal genocide, wiping out half of all life — but they come up short on their quest. In what plays like Infinity War’s missing third act, the remaining heroes track down the Mad Titan only to discover that the Infinity Stones, which could have been used to bring back their fallen comrades, are no more. Thor, in his anger over failing to stop Thanos before, beheads him without mercy, effectively ending the story.

The real story begins five years later, as the characters finally deal with the consequences of their failures. What follows is a film that veers between both the quiet contemplations and raucous eruptions that have been missing from these films for far too long. The result is often messy, imbalanced and bloated, but it’s ultimately satisfying despite all these things, because it picks up the broken pieces of a decade-long series without running from what came before.

This is Avengers: Endgame.

Avengers Endgame

Re-Introducing the Avengers

A full hour goes by before a major fight scene — both a welcome reprieve and a surprising one — because Avengers: Endgame is as concerned with winking fan-service as it is with paying off a decade of story. Fittingly, those two things end up being one and the same on more than one occasion. The way some characters’ stories conclude is far from ideal, but before all the fun and fireworks, each original Avenger gets their moment to shine, as the film paints them as a product of their failures.

Black Widow/Natasha Romanoff now leads the Avengers, or what’s left of them. She checks-in constantly, keeping a track of both earth-bound issues and problems out in space, and she even asks de-facto Wakandan leader Okoye what they can do to stop natural disasters. She’s thrown herself into her work out of desperation, in the hopes of finding some way to make up for letting half her people die. She’s still trying to wipe the red from her ledger, as it were, though despite now having Tony Stark’s obsessive disposition, she lacks the tools and the know-how to take radical steps.

Captain America/Steve Rogers, too, has taken on the mantle of a fellow Avenger: The Falcon/Sam Wilson who, in Captain America: The Winter Soldier, was introduced as a counselor for returning veterans. Rogers now leads group therapy sessions out in New Jersey, where he helps grief-stricken citizens move on from the global devastation. Though his optimism is hardly practical. Rogers seemingly having moved on (or having pretended to) is grating to the likes of Romanoff, who can’t bring herself to do the same. Despite his talk of now seeing whales in the Hudson, this isn’t what moving on from loss really looks like for Rogers — as evidenced later in the film, when he ventures back to his “birthplace,” Camp Lehigh. It’s just what burying his grief and giving up looks like, since there’s nothing left for him to avenge.

Tony Stark/Iron Man has given up too, though for him, burying the past means opting for a selfish future. A respite he’s more than earned, given his work since 2008 — he chooses his wife and daughter over helping the world — but at the same time, it’s the ultimate signifier of his failure. In all his appearances between Iron Man and Avengers: Age of Ultron, the series seemed to push the reset button on Stark, though this narrative stagnancy eventually became the character’s cornerstone, as he tinkered with newer, more dangerous ways to protect the world at large, even at the cost of his relationships. Now, he has everything he could want in his personal life, though it comes at the cost of the greater good. In a way, it had to; Tony Stark could never have had it all when the world was still in danger.

Clint Barton/Hawkeye, after proving to be the beating heart of the team in Avengers: Age of Ultron, has become a ruthless vigilante. A man who once fought for his wife, his kids, and his protégé Wanda Maximoff, he’s had them ripped away. Now he fights out of pure, blinding, nihilistic rage, killing the organized criminals who Thanos spared — as if to step into Thanos’ shoes, enacting a twisted vision of universal balance (albeit solely on people of colour, as far as we see; a bizarre choice of optics). When Romanoff tells him there might be a way out, the mere thought of hope feels like despair.

Thor, despite the camera’s occasional fat-shaming gaze, feels appropriately tragic, having lost himself down a rabbit-hole of food and drink. He looks more like his comrade Volstagg (Ray Stevenson) than the God of Thunder, though what brings this new Thor to life is Chris Hemsworth’s devastating performance, as a man burying his sorrows beneath everything from facial hair to video games. When the camera isn’t focused on Thor’s prosthetic gut for cheap laughs (in contrast, Tony Stark’s weight-loss is treated with the requisite seriousness), Hemsworth’s eyes betray the sorrow behind his playful smile. Every one of his films thus far was about living up to his father’s expectations of great leadership. But now, he’s left even “New Asgard” to its own devices, as the mere mention of Thanos fills him with crippling dread.

Five out of six ain’t bad, right?

Avengers Endgame

Re-Introducing the Rest

Bruce Banner/The Hulk is delightful in his hybrid form, but what separates him from his teammates is he doesn’t feel like a product of a world where half the people have been snapped away; it’s as if he’s been pulled from some other, earlier Marvel film, like a leftover concept. He even references feeling lost and then finding a sense of balance — the biggest possible development for this character takes place off screen! — and after his dropped character arc in Avengers: Infinity War, his re-introduction here serves little purpose beyond comic relief.

Still, the subversion of the Hulk now being the cheeriest and most put-together of the bunch is pleasant enough to not be a major detraction, especially when compared to the otherwise happy-go-lucky Scott Lang/Ant-Man. Lang, after returning to a world where his friends have suddenly been dead for five years, is filled with a sense of inexplicable angst, as he tries to process what Hope Van Dyne/The Wasp actually meant to him. His point-of-view becomes vital to understanding this dour new world, a realization that allows Paul Rudd to imbue the character with more urgency, and a shorter temper.

Of the remaining characters, Nebula finds herself in the most interesting position, at least in initial scenes. Once a ruthless assassin who paid back the pain she was dealt, she’s now a caregiver to the likes of Tony Stark, who appears to be living his final days as the two are stranded in space, and to Rocket, with whom she commiserates over the Guardians’ deaths when she arrives on Earth. Though once the plot kicks into motion and jumps ahead five years, she and Rocket are essentially out of the picture, protecting distant quadrants until it’s time for the team to re-unite. Not every character can be handled with deftness in a film so large, but it’s still a disappointment given the way this same team of creators — directors Joe & Anthony Russo, and writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely — were able to give nearly a dozen characters coherent story arcs in Captain America: Civil War.

Okoye ends up sidelined too, despite having one of the most powerful reactions to any death in Avengers: Infinity War. Carol Danvers, who’s barely had a chance to interact with the main characters, even announces her departure from the film early on, so the increased focus she’s given in the film’s climax makes little sense, given how flimsy of a connection she has to the people and events on-screen. Rhodey/War Machine, too, ends up in the middle ground as usual, forever a supporting player to the other heroes.

While the supporting cast members often feel like benched players, the remaining Avengers’ arcs do, for the most part, pay off the stories the set up by the film’s first hour. And the result, while nestled amidst the usual bombast, is marvelous.

Pages: 1 2Next page

Avengers Endgame Spoilers

Revisiting the Past: Iron Man and Captain America

After Lang returns from his quantum trip — five hours later for him, five years later for the rest — the Avengers decide to venture into the past and retrieve the Infinity Stones before they’re destroyed. The film establishes its time-travel rules up front (though it breaks them for good dramatic reason in the final scene), in that changing the past won’t change the present, but would create alternate timelines instead. This allows for greater dramatic and even comedic possibilities amidst the Avengers’ scheme, since interacting with the past isn’t off the table. Of course, since they aren’t racing against a ticking clock, they’re also in possession of a very limited supply of Hank Pym’s science mumbo jumbo juice, the Pym Particles, so do-overs are nearly impossible.

This “time heist” is the indulgent payoff to eleven years of shared continuity. Avengers: Endgame is separated from most time-travel films because the characters re-visit not only past events, but entirely different movies, and the choice of when and where they visit is especially dramatically potent.

The team of Banner, Stark, Rogers and Lang all land up in New York during The Avengers, wherein the film tools around with its predecessor’s visual language ever so slightly. We first re-visit the iconic shot of the original team assembling for the very first time. However, the camera holds about a second longer, as they begin to leave their circular formation; right from the get-go, we witness events as they already occurred, though from a slightly altered perspective (and with foreknowledge of how they played out, given what our time-travelers know).

In what amounts to the unseen post-script of the “Battle of New York,” the time-travelling quartet inserts themselves into the gaps between familiar scenes and characters. Rogers even battles a past version of himself, jokingly dismissing his own “I can do this all day” catchphrase, before sullying the past Rogers’ view of reality (“Bucky is alive!”) in order to distract him. The present Rogers meets his past self at arguably his most saccharine, before his worldview was thrown for a loop in Captain America: The Winter Soldier and before he’d wised up to the complexities modern world.

In essence, the current Steve Rogers, who uses unbridled, uncritical optimism as a crutch, is forced to take advantage of his own naïveté — his first step to accepting that he hasn’t actually moved on, or really dealt with the bleakness of the modern world. His second step occurs when he and Stark are forced to travel back further, after an unexpected kerfuffle involving Loki and the Tesseract, wherein both men are faced with the spectres of their pasts (while Banner is off providing alternate-dimension exposition with The Ancient One, presumably to set up future films and shows).

Avengers Endgame

Camp Lehigh

In the 1970s, in order to retrieve both extra Pym Particles an earlier version of the Tesseract from S.H.I.E.L.D., Stark and Rogers venture to Camp Lehigh — “The Birthplace of Captain America,” previously seen in The First Avenger and The Winter Soldier — where Stark, like a mischievous child, has to talk his way out of being found out by his own father, Howard. Meanwhile, Rogers hides out in Peggy Carter’s office where he sees his picture on her desk, decades after his disappearance. Here, he catches a glimpse of the woman and the life he thought he’d had no choice but to leave behind — “Family. Stability. The guy who wanted all that went into the ice 75 years ago,” he says in Avengers: Age of Ultron.

Stark, a father himself, has begun healing from his paternal abandonment in the five years since the snap, as he now that he understands the position his own father was in. He even gives expecting parent Howard fatherly advice of his own, as if to close the loop that was opened (and subsequently dropped) by Iron Man 2, arguably one of the worst films in the series. As if to echo the events of Iron Man 2, in which Stark invents a new element thanks to his father’s secret messages, time-travel becomes a possibility when Stark makes a similar discovery via computer simulation. Only this time, rather than the result of phantom daddy issues that don’t quite manifest, this discovery leads him to confronting his father and finding closure. And, in a more immediate sense, it also has real and tangible dramatic grounding.

Where the “new element” was a means to create a new suit, Stark’s time-travel “Eureka!” moment leads to a moral dilemma, one that forces him to choose between his own family and stability, and the greater good that might put them at risk. As if to confirm that Tony Stark made the right choice, the young Howard Stark elucidates his own major character flaw — “Let’s just say the greater good has rarely outweighed my own self-interest” — as something he hopes his son will someday learn from. Of course, unbeknownst to him, Tony Stark is living proof that Howard left the world better than he found it, as the series finally makes good on the line of dialogue that Howard, in his own form of time travel, would go on to record on film and leave to his son:

“What is and always will be my greatest creation, is you.”

Avengers Endgame

Revisiting The Past: Thor

In a similar instance of re-visiting a generally disliked film, Thor and Rocket attempt to extract the Reality Stone from a sleeping Jane Foster during the events of Thor: The Dark World. A major failing of Thor’s first sequel (and of the MCU in general) is how often characters’ mothers are brushed aside in favour of deeply rooted paternal angst. In The Dark World, Thor’s mother Frigga dies in battle, and neither of her sons are afforded much of a reaction in the edit, let alone a long-lasting grief that defines their actions or stories. Her death felt incidental, though here, it’s finally given greater importance when Thor returns to the day she’s destined to die.

The purpose of fathers in the Marvel Universe is heroes wrestling with legacy. The Wakandan legacy, the Stark legacy, the Asgardian legacy, the list goes on. Thor, thus far, has been defined by how he chooses to rule Asgard. This mantle and responsibility is passed down to him by his father, Odin, whose approval he spends three films fighting for in some way. Yet it takes Frigga’s nurturing to free Thor from this cycle of failing to live up to his father’s kingship.

The anxiety-stricken Thor is visibly lost; “The future has not been kind to you,” Frigga tells him, recognizing his ruse. Rather than telling how to live up to lofty expectations (set for him over the centuries!), she advises him on how to deal with his failures: by succeeding at being who he is, rather than who he’s “supposed to be.” It’s a touching sentiment, and while there’s little follow-through to be found in Endgame itself (though it motivates him in the moment, pushing him to retrieve his hammer and prove his worth), it does allow his story to end on a meaningful, coming-of-age note, as he ventures off to find himself alongside the Guardians.

Unlike The Avengers, few of these story threads individually manifest in the climactic fight, as one might now expect from Marvel. Though Endgame’s final battle, in its totality, is still built on these individual stories. Despite its various failings, the scene proves to be one of the very best in the Marvel Universe, offering payoff upon payoff in one of the most rousing cinematic climaxes in recent memory.

***

In Part 2: the final battle, the women of Marvel, and why the film’s fan-service (mostly) works.

Pages: Previous page 1 2

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.slashfilm.com/road-to-endgame-avengers-endgame/

2019-05-02 15:00:31Z
52780280635096

Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner married by Elvis impersonator in Las Vegas - CNN

News of the wedding emerged after US DJ Diplo posted a series of videos on Instagram.
"Gonna hit this wedding real quick," reads one caption over a video showing Turner in a white bridal outfit walking past with Jonas.
Diplo also tagged the pair in another video showing Turner in a veil holding a bouquet of flowers, with the caption "true love."
And clips from an Instagram live video posted on his account have been surfacing on Twitter.
The pair have been engaged since 2017.
One shows the moment that the couple exchange vows in a ceremony led by an Elvis Presley impersonator.
Turner's publicist Gertie Lowe at Public Eye confirmed to CNN that the pair were married in the US last night.
The couple announced their engagement in 2017 following a whirlwind romance.
Turner, 23, is best known for her role as Sansa Stark in the smash hit TV series "Game of Thrones," while Jonas, 29, is a member of the award-winning pop rock band The Jonas Brothers.
The British actress has previously spoken about her sexuality and suggested she thought she would be single for the rest of her life, but on meeting Jonas she knew she'd found the one.
Sophie Turner's comment about her sexuality stirs debate
The Jonas Brothers announce their first tour in almost a decade
"I feel like I'm much older a soul than I am in age," she said during an interview with Rolling Stone. "I feel like I've lived enough life to know. I've met enough guys to know -- I've met enough girls to know."
Asked to expand on the part about girls, Turner said: "Everyone experiments."
For his part, Jonas announced a 40-date North America tour on May 1, the first time The Jonas Brothers will hit the road in almost a decade.
The newlyweds were in Las Vegas to attend the Billboard Music Awards ceremony at MGM Garden Arena.
Canadian rapper Drake was one of the big winners, taking home awards for top artist, top male artist and Top Billboard 200 Album for "Scorpion."
And Drake is clearly a "Game of Thrones" fan, using his acceptance speech to mention Arya Stark, a character who has played a pivotal role in the latest series of the show.
"Hey, shout-out to Arya Stark for putting in that work last week," Drake said, in a reference to the Battle of Winterfell episode last Sunday.
This story has been updated to clarify Drake's nationality.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/02/entertainment/sophie-turner-joe-jonas-marriage-scli-intl/index.html

2019-05-02 14:33:00Z
52780283518313

Here's What You Need To Know About The Beyoncé/Taylor Swift Drama At The BBMAs - BuzzFeed

So, last night was the Billboard Music Awards. I'm sure you already know that because the internet is a thing and people didn't stop talking about it all night. Drake was the big winner, walking away with an unfathomable 12 awards.

Amy Sussman / Getty Images

I guess you could say Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner were also big winners on the night, considering they left the BBMAs and got freakin' MARRIED!

Anyway, what you might be surprised to know is that there was also drama on the night between Beyoncé fans and Taylor Swift fans, a wild concept considering Beyoncé wasn't even in attendance. But hey, that's where I come in to explain what the hell is going on.

The Wendy Williams Show

So, it all started when Taylor opened the BBMAs with a performance of her new song, "Me". People loved it but tbh I was too busy concentrating on Brendon Urie, who descended from the ceiling like Mary freakin' Poppins.

Kevin Winter / Getty Images

Brendon Urie look at me like this challenge.

Kevin Winter / Getty Images

Anyway, Brendan wasn't a part of the drama, he was just there looking adorable and serving vocals. The issue stemmed from the beginning of the performance, which opened with a marching band before Taylor strutted on stage and struck a pose.

However, Beyoncé fans immediately noticed a similarity. Remember Homecoming, the Netflix documentary about Bey's performance at Coachella? Well, it starts in a similar way, from the whistle blow at the beginning to the marching band intro.

Larry Busacca / Getty Images

And it was very clear that people weren't happy about it.

TAYLOR SWIFT JUST BIT TF OUTTA BEYONCE ON THE BILLBOARD AWARDS ... I’m 💀😭😭😭💀💀💀💀 where is the beyhive????

I don’t know if y’all are seeing this but Taylor Swift is gentrifying Beyonce’s Coachella performance right now

In fact, they weren't happy at all.

TS: Beyoncé can I copy your homework? Bey: Sure just change it up a little so it doesn’t look obviously

Of course, it didn't take long for Taylor Swift fans to bite back, and from then on, it was just all out war.

#Mayochella everyone cyber bullying Taylor Swift as if Beyoncé invented whistles, drums and putting your hand on your hip. Beyoncé is an icon but you're all assholes and honestly so stupid if you think that either Beyoncé or Taylor care about what you think.

beyonce invented standing on stage with two legs how could taylor do that ??? SHE'S A COPY CAT BEYONCE DID THAT FIRST 😡😡😡 https://t.co/Jv3iOjaB5s

I AM SICK AND TIRED OF YOU ALL ATTACKING @taylorswift13 HER PERFORMANCE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH BEYONCÉ. LEAVE TAYLOR ALONE. SHE JUST WANTS TO BE FUCKING HAPPY OMFG YALL ARE TRASH.

Interestingly, Beyoncé's art director tweeted amidst the drama, simply posting a crying face emoji. Who knows what that was in reference to...

Anyway, others said that people shouldn't compare the two and both Bey and Tay are super successful in their own right.

Girl, it’s drums... Beyoncé wasn’t the first to use drums in a performance and Taylor definitely isn’t either. Beyoncé had a whole as band and Taylor had just drums. Y’all need to stop comparing the most general things just because you don’t like Taylor. https://t.co/ORySBD7tQf

I can’t believe that twitter has gotten to the point where people are comparing Beyoncé and Taylor’s drum lines.. so Taylor used drums, lots of people do big whoop.. I love Bey but this really isn’t THAT big of a deal

Let's also not forget that Beyoncé and Taylor are at least on friendly terms. Back in 2009, when Kanye West infamously interrupted Taylor's VMAs acceptance speech, Beyoncé later invited Taylor up on stage to give the speech again.

Christopher Polk / Getty Images

And there doesn't seem to be an obvious reason that the two wouldn't still be on friendly terms now.

Michael Kovac / WireImage

Beyoncé has even attended Taylor's birthday parties in the past.

Oh, and conspiracy theory time.

*taps microphone* you are aware that music industry power players like Taylor and Beyoncé are aware of each other’s next moves & that Taylor incorporating a drumline 2 weeks after Homecoming came out was probably manufactured to make us all talk about them both more, right?

Meanwhile, Paula Abdul was doing this, which I think deserves waaaaay more attention.

BuzzFeed has reached out to reps of Beyoncé and Taylor for comment.

Ben Henry is a celebrity reporter for BuzzFeed UK and is based in London.

Contact Ben Henry at ben.henry@buzzfeed.com.

Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.buzzfeed.com/benhenry/taylor-swift-beyonce-bbmas-drama

2019-05-02 13:56:57Z
52780279427639

Captain Marvel in Endgame Poses a Problem for the MCU - /FILM

captain marvel in endgame

Captain Marvel is an entertaining film. It’s not one of the best entries in the MCU, but it’s fun to watch, and Brie Larson makes for a great, sarcastic, no bullshit superhero. Larson’s Carl Danvers/Captain Marvel is, in short, a great new addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. But the MCU has a serious Captain Marvel problem: they don’t know what to do with her.

This isn’t Larson’s fault. Nor is it the character’s fault. The problem boils down to this: Carol is so powerful, that the only solution the MCU can think of level the playing field is to sideline her. Spoilers follow.

Brie Larson’s Captain Marvel made quite an impression in Avengers: Endgame. First, she gets a cool new haircut. Second, she gets to kick some serious ass. But we have to wait a very long time to see that. Almost three full hours, in fact. On one hand, you can understand why this is happening. Endgame has a ton of characters to deal with, and not everyone can get the same amount of screentime. But the sidelining of Carol Danvers in the film seems ill-advised, especially since the film is being released after the standalone Captain Marvel movie just introduced her. Why have that movie at all, if she’s barely going to figure in to the movie? Why not just introduce her in Endgame?

It genuinely seems like Marvel doesn’t know what to do with Carol. Much like Superman, Carol is superpowered to the extreme. Writers and filmmakers have been struggling with this in regard to Superman for years. How do you make someone so invincible, so unstoppable, engaging? What’s the point in putting a character like that in danger, when we always know they’ll come out ahead? More often than not, storytellers introduce some sort of weakness to exploit in order to bring Superman down a few notches.

But Endgame doesn’t have time for that. So instead, it sends Carol off into space, only to bring her in in the final battle to kick some butt. When she shows up, it’s exciting. She bursts through the atmosphere in a sonic boom, and pummels Thanos in ways the other heroes could not. Watching Carol unload on Thanos, it becomes clear why Endgame waited so long to bring her back. Had she been around sooner, Thanos would’ve been stopped much quicker. On the surface, this is fine – because that’s what the story requires. The story demands that Thanos stay alive a little longer, which means Carol can’t go punching his big, stupid purple face into oblivion.

But surely there has to be a better solution than benching her, like an injured football player. The character deserves better than that. As do the character’s fans. To be fair, Marvel is just getting started with Carol Danvers. Hopefully in films to come, writers and directors will find clever, exciting ways to keep Carol in a story while also keeping her mega-powers from ending the story too quickly. But that takes work. It takes commitment. It takes time. And the Endgame screenwriters just didn’t have that time.

Which means I should probably cut them some slack. Yet it bothers me. Give us more Brie Larson. Give us more Carol Danvers. Don’t introduce a character, write yourself into a corner, and then shrug and push her off to the side. Find new ways to keep us engrossed, and keep her part of the action. If filmmakers have managed to do this with Superman several times, there’s no reason they can’t do the same with Captain Marvel.

“She’s one of the most powerful – and one of the most popular – characters in our comics,” Marvel Studios chief Kevin Feige said of Captain Marvel, “and will be the most powerful character in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.” That’s great! Now find a way to make it work, please.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.slashfilm.com/captain-marvel-in-endgame/

2019-05-02 14:00:25Z
52780280635096

Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner Get Married at Las Vegas Chapel - TMZ

Joe Jonas, Sophie Turner We Got Hitched!!! ... With Elvis' Help

Exclusive Details

6:45 AM PT -- Jesse Grice, Reverend Elvis who officiated, tells TMZ he was booked for the wedding a week ago but wasn't told who was getting hitched. We're told Joe and Sophie booked the entire Chapel from 8 PM to 12 AM ... so no other weddings were going down. Grice says he recognized the Jonas Bros, but had no idea who Sophie Turner was because he doesn't watch "Game of Thrones."

Grice serenaded Joe and Sophie to "Viva Las Vegas" after the "I dos." 

BTW ... Joe and Sophie got married on what would have been the 52nd anniversary of the marriage between Elvis and Priscilla.

Guess what happened last night? Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner got hitched, and their wedding could not have been more different than the Nick/Priyanka nuptials.

Here's the way it went down ... the Jonas Bros performed at the Billboard Music Awards Wednesday night in Vegas, and afterwards they all beelined it for the Little White Wedding Chapel. Yup, Elvis is in the building.

You wouldn't know a wedding was going down by appearances, because Sophie didn't wear a wedding dress, although she looked super good in a white blouse and slacks.

So, there's inside the Chapel L'Amour, and the Elvis impersonator comes out and before long Joe and Sophie say to each other, "I promise you, I will never leave you. I will love and trust you all the days of my life, in sickness and in health, forever and ever."

Country stars Dan + Shay were there to sing Sophie down the aisle, and Joe's bros, Nick and Kevin, looked on as groomsmen ... and that was pretty much it.

They followed tradition and posed in front of the Cadillac at the Chapel and, of course, with the Reverend Elvis in red -- and they were husband and wife.

Oh, and this ... they exchanged ring pops as wedding bands!!!

Turns out they applied for a marriage license earlier in the day in Vegas. That doesn't necessarily mean the wedding wasn't planned -- they probably waited to make sure it all stayed secret.

A few celebs were on hand, including Diplo and Khalid ... the whole thing was super casual and pretty damn cool. BTW, Diplo captured the action inside the chapel on Instagram Live.

It COULD NOT have been more different from the endless wedding of Nick Jonas and Priyanka Chopra, which was beyond elaborate and lasted 9 years.

CONGRATS!!!!

Originally Published -- 4:03 AM PT

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.tmz.com/2019/05/02/joe-jonas-and-sophie-turner-get-married-las-vegas-elvis/

2019-05-02 13:51:00Z
CBMiV2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRtei5jb20vMjAxOS8wNS8wMi9qb2Utam9uYXMtYW5kLXNvcGhpZS10dXJuZXItZ2V0LW1hcnJpZWQtbGFzLXZlZ2FzLWVsdmlzL9IBV2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRtei5jb20vMjAxOS8wNS8wMi9qb2Utam9uYXMtYW5kLXNvcGhpZS10dXJuZXItZ2V0LW1hcnJpZWQtbGFzLXZlZ2FzLWVsdmlzLw