'Pets 2' and 'Dark Phoenix' Top Weekend Box Office, Though Both Underperform - Box Office Mojo

by Brad Brevet
June 9, 2019

The weekend's top twelve combined to outperform the same weekend last year by more than 43%, which means the year-to-year gap continues to close, but the weekend's new releases both struggled mightily. Universal and Illumination's The Secret Life of Pets 2 was unable to even deliver half of the opening the first film delivered just a few years ago, while Fox's Dark Phoenix entered the weekend as the worst reviewed film in the X-Men franchise ever and, predictably, delivered the lowest opening weekend of the franchise.

At the top of the box office is Universal and Illumination's The Secret Life of Pets 2 with an estimated $47.1 million from 4,561 locations (the second widest opening ever only to Avengers: Endgame). The performance is less than half of the original, 2016 film's $104.3 million, which remains a record opening for an original, animated feature. Heading into the weekend expectations weren't exactly meteoric, with the studio hoping for an opening over $50 million, but even that proved an impossible task.

Looking ahead, Pets 2 received an "A-" CinemaScore from opening day audiences, while playing to a crowd that was 57% female with 62% of the film's opening crowd being family moviegoers. As for the film's future, it compares to the $48.4 million opening for Hotel Transylvania 2 and the $47.6 million debut for Kung Fu Panda 2, both of which went on to gross over $165 million, albeit neither played in the middle of the summer movie season, which will make the future of this film interesting to watch.

Internationally, Pets 2 began playing overseas two weeks ago and this weekend added 21 markets including the Netherlands ($1.7m), Vietnam ($1.3m), Italy ($1.1m) and Taiwan ($800k). Overall, the film brought in $16 million this weekend from a total of 30 markets for an international cume that currently stands at $49 million. The film's top market is Russia with just shy of $17 million with openings yet to come in Australia (Jun 20), Germany (Jun 27), Brazil (Jun 27), China (Jul 5), Japan (Jul 26), Korea (Jul 31), France (Jul 31), Spain (Aug 9) and Mexico (Aug 9).

In second place things don't get any better as Disney's release of Fox's Dark Phoenix could only manage an estimated $33 million debut, making it the first film in the X-Men franchise to fail to deliver a $50+ million opening. In fact, like Pets 2 the film's opening is well off even the studio's modest, $40-50 million expectations and over $30 million shy of the disappointing, $65.7 million opening for X-Men: Apocalypse three years ago.

The average multiplier for films in the X-Men franchise is 2.5x, which would suggest we're looking at an $82.5 million domestic run for Dark Phoenix, which would make it the first film in the franchise to finish below $100 million domestically. The film received a "B-" CinemaScore from opening day audiences, which is a grade below the "A-" score for X-Men: Apocalypse, as audiences seemed to agree with the negative critical reception. The audience was 57% male with 61% of the opening weekend crowd coming in aged 25 years or older.

Internationally, Dark Phoenix debuted in all but Japan this weekend, bringing in an estimated $107 million, led by a $45.6 million opening in China. Additional openings include South Korea ($5.7m), Mexico ($5.0m), UK ($4.9m), France ($3.8m), Russia ($3.4m), Brazil ($2.9m), Philippines ($2.4m), Taiwan ($2.3m) and India ($2.3m). The film will open in Japan on June 21.

Disney's Aladdin took third with an estimated $24.5 million, signaling a solid, -43% drop as it enters its third week in release. The film's domestic cume is now over $232 million. Internationally, the film added another $67.6 million this weekend for an overseas cume totaling $372.5 million, pushing Aladdin's global tally just shy of $605 million

In fourth, Warner's Godzilla: King of the Monsters dropped hard, falling -67.5% for an estimated $15.5 million second weekend. The drop isn't exactly a surprise, though it is a fraction steeper than the large, -67% drop the 2014 original felt, which continues to put a question mark on the film's overall domestic run and whether or not it will be able to go much higher than $100 million. The film's domestic gross currently stands at $78.6 million.

Internationally, Godzilla added $47.1 million this weekend for an overseas cume that stands at $213.7 million and a global tally topping $292 million. Spain remains the final key market for the film, where it will release on June 21.

Rounding out the top five is Paramount's Rocketman, which dropped -46% in its second weekend for an estimated $14 million. The film's domestic cume now stands at just over $50 million after ten days in release. Internationally, the film added $13 million from 50 markets for an overseas cume that now totals just over $51 million and a worldwide gross over $101 million.

In limited release, Amazon Studios began the platform release of their record, $13 million Sundance acquisition, Late Night, debuting the film in four locations this weekend with an estimated $249,654 and a chart-topping $62,414 per theater average. The film will go nationwide in over 1,500 locations next weekend.

Additionally, A24's The Last Black Man In San Francisco opened in seven theaters in NY, LA and San Francisco and delivered an estimated $230,744 for a per screen average of $32,963. The film will expand into top markets next weekend.

Other limited releases include CBS Films's Pavarotti, which opened in 19 locations with an estimated $142,500 ($7,500 PTA); Super's This One's for the Ladies opened in one theater with an estimated $16,000; and IFC's Framing John DeLorean brought in an estimated $9,106 from one theater.

Next weekend will see Sony's release of Men in Black International debut in over 3,800 location; WB will release Shaft in over 2,900 theaters; Focus will debut Jim Jarmusch's The Dead Don't Die in approximately 550 theaters; and the aforementioned Amazon release Late Night will go into wide release.

You can check out all of this weekend's estimated results right here and we'll be updating our charts with weekend actuals on Monday afternoon.

Discuss this story with fellow Box Office Mojo fans on Facebook. On Twitter, follow us at @boxofficemojo.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=4519

2019-06-09 15:59:03Z
52780311192947

Are Prince William and Kate Middleton 'at War' with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle? - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Reports of feuds brewing between Prince William and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton continue to gain steam, with a recent report claiming the couples are “at war” with each other. Strong words, for sure, but the news that Prince Harry and Markle are leaving their charity collaboration definitely adds some fuel to the rumors.

Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, Prince William, and Kate Middleton | Anwar Hussein/WireImage

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are removing themselves from the Royal Foundation

Once upon a time, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and Prince William and Middleton worked together on their Royal Foundation. Now the Sussexes are said to be moving away from the charity.

Fans of the royals will recall that the foursome was dubbed the “fab four” when they all graced the stage together last year for the charity’s Q&A session. That was then, this is now… and the couples want to pursue their own charities separately.

Did ‘tension’ play a part in the decision?

It’s believed that the decision to pursue their own interests separately breaking up the “fab four,” is the result of “tension,” as a royal source explained to The Sun: “Things did get very bad between the brothers and they didn’t see each other privately for a number of months after the royal wedding.”

The insider continued: “Certainly the animosity over status, money and Meghan meant that the split in their joint households had to be brought forward much more quickly than anticipated, so perhaps it was inevitable that their joint charity has to be split too.”

Will some PR efforts be needed to smooth this over?

Royal expert Angela Mollard believes that this split over the charity will further support the notion that the couples are “at war” with each other and that some “damage limitation” will be in order.

In speaking with The Morning Show, Mollard noted: “When they announce, if there is going to be a split, they’ll have to do a lot of PR and damage limitation around it.”

She continued: “It’s very hard to believe these couples are not at war with each other,” adding, “There is no actual reason they have to do it, I can’t see. They’ve split their households, geographically, they’ve moved to different places — I understand that.”

Why the charity split is ‘significant’

The split with the charity, however, is “significant,” according to Mollard. She explained: “But The Royal Foundation is a linchpin in the work that they do. This is really significant. This charity, The Royal Foundation, was set up in 2009 so a decade ago. Its remit is to look at all their interests — wildlife, mental health, armed forces.”

She added: “We’re going to hear in a month what’s going to happen but all indications are they are going to split the foundation and go their separate way in terms of their interests, in the things they are going to prosecute together.”

Things are believed to have gotten tense between the brothers when, according to royal author Katie Nicholl, William “urged some caution in a well-meaning brotherly fashion” when Harry and Markle started getting serious. The well-intentioned advice didn’t go over well and Harry was reportedly angry and hurt by William’s comments.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/are-prince-william-kate-middleton-at-war-with-prince-harry-meghan-markle.html/

2019-06-09 15:41:55Z
52780311373403

Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger are married - CNN

The couple wed in Montecito, California on Saturday, a source close to Pratt tells CNN.

Pratt, 39, and Schwarzenegger, 29, announced their engagement in January after dating quietly for months.

"Sweet Katherine, so happy you said yes!" the "Guardians of the Galaxy" actor wrote. "I'm thrilled to be marrying you. Proud to live boldly in faith with you. Here we go!"

Schwarzenegger is the daughter of Arnold Schwarzenegger, the actor and former California governor, and broadcast journalist Maria Shriver, a niece of President John F. Kennedy. Pratt is also known for his roles in "Parks and Recreation" and "Jurassic World."

Pratt has a son, Jack, with his ex-wife, actress Anna Faris. They separated in 2017 after eight years of marriage.

Faris offered words of encouragement on Pratt's Instagram post announcing his engagement to Schwarzenegger: "I'm so happy for you both!"

CNN has reached out to Pratt's representative for comment.

CNN's Sandra Gonzalez contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/09/entertainment/chris-pratt-katherine-schwarzenegger-married/index.html

2019-06-09 13:56:00Z
52780311339924

Chris Pratt marries Katherine Schwarzenegger in California - Page Six

Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger are husband and wife.

On Saturday, the couple said their “I dos” at the San Ysidro Ranch in Montecito, California, where they were joined by family and close friends, US Weekly confirmed.

Pratt, 39, and Schwarzenegger, 29, began dating in June 2018 after her mother, Maria Shriver, reportedly introduced the pair.

They announced their engagement on social media in January.

“Sweet Katherine, so happy you said yes! I’m thrilled to be marrying you. Proud to live boldly in faith with you. Here we go,” the “Guardians of The Galaxy” actor captioned a sweet photo of them hugging while showing off her massive engagement ring.

Shriver also congratulated the couple on their engagement at the time, writing on social media, “Congratulations to two loving, kind, caring, thoughtful, spiritual people. We are so happy for you. You are blessed, as is everyone who knows you. Yes, let’s go.” Katherine’s famous dad Arnold Schwarzenegger also offered his blessing.

Pratt was previously married to actress Anna Faris. The couple announced their split in 2017 after eight years of marriage. They share one son together, 6-year-old Jack.

Proving the co-parents are still on good terms following their split, Faris commented on Pratt’s engagement, “I’m so happy for you both!! Congratulations!”

Reps for Pratt and Schwarzenegger did not immediately return our request for comment.

Share this:

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://pagesix.com/2019/06/09/chris-pratt-marries-katherine-schwarzenegger-in-california/

2019-06-09 13:29:00Z
52780311339924

Chris Pratt & Katherine Schwarzenegger Are Now Married - HarpersBAZAAR.com

• Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger are now married!
• The wedding took place at the San Ysidro Ranch in Santa Barbara, California on June 8, 2019.
• Pratt and Schwarzenegger announced their engagement in January 2019. Pratt was previously married to actress Anna Faris.

---

Congratulations are most definitely in order as Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger have officially tied the knot.

The Guardians of the Galaxy actor wed Arnold Schwarzenegger's daughter on Saturday June 8, 2019 at the exclusive San Ysidro Ranch in California. The Daily Mail is reporting that Katherine was walked down the aisle by her famous father, while mother Maria Shriver can be seen greeting guests in multiple photos over on the site.

Pratt's son, Jack, from his marriage to Anna Faris was spotted at the fairytale nuptials. The Daily Mail is also reporting that Faris was apparently present for the big day, though this is unconfirmed.

Pratt and Schwarzenegger were seen riding on a golf buggy around the San Ysidro Ranch. The bride wore a gorgeous white dress with an impressive train:

Splash News

---

Actor Rob Lowe shared two photos on Instagram, of his wife and two sons ready for the event:

---

Meanwhile, a source told People, "You can tell today is the happiest day for Katherine. She hasn’t stopped smiling. And Chris seems giddy with excitement." The source continued, "The venue is beautiful. Lots of flowers and greenery everywhere. It’s a very romantic setting for a wedding."

The former Everwood actor confirmed his engagement via Instagram in January 2019, by sharing an adorable photo taken with his now-wife. Pratt wrote, "Sweet Katherine, so happy you said yes! I’m thrilled to be marrying you. Proud to live boldly in faith with you. Here we go! 💍🙏♥️":

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27858744/chris-pratt-katherine-schwarzenegger-wedding-photos/

2019-06-09 10:57:00Z
52780311339924

Why Everybody Is Wrong About Kate Middleton Being a 'Social Climber' - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Meghan Markle is often dragged through the media for being a “social climber.” Now, some people are saying Kate Middleton is the bigger social climber.

Why do fans of the royal family feel the need to argue over which duchess is better? Supporting women should mean supporting all women, but let’s take a look at their argument. Is Kate Middleton really a social climber? Does it even matter?

How Kate Middleton and Prince William met

Kate Middleton | Samir Hussein/WireImage

Kate met Prince William when they were both attending St. Andrews University. The pair were introduced through mutual friends, but the magic didn’t happen until William saw Kate walk down the runway in a charity fashion show. Kate wore a see-through, black mesh dress. The prince turned toward his friend and whispered, “Wow, Kate’s Hot!” From that point on, he began to pursue her.

Why some say Kate Middleton is a ‘social climber’

In a video circling Twitter, royal commentator Elaine Lui- who many in the comments claim is a known Meghan supporter, claims Kate is the real ‘social climber.’ “If we’re talking about royal social climbing, it’s not just Meghan Markle,” she said, before launching into a long list of reasons why Kate pursued William.

Most of what she said is unverified, like claiming Kate switched schools to get closer to the prince and then stopped hanging out with her “common” friends. Kate did change schools, but we don’t know her reasoning. And many say the timing just doesn’t add up. Kate would have had to make her final school decision before the palace announced which school William would be attending.

The claim that she doesn’t spend time with people outside the royal circle is false as well. Kate has a large group of friends, many who she has known since school.

Why the whole ‘social climber’ argument is silly

It doesn’t appear that Kate spent a whole bunch of her time pursuing William. She probably did find him attractive — who can blame her for that — but she didn’t follow him around like many of the other girls did. It wasn’t until William began pursuing her that their romantic relationship began.

Even so, what if Kate had been the one to pursue William? Would that really be such a big deal? Many women make the first move in a relationship, and we usually don’t bat an eye. Some say it’s because she wanted to be a part of the royal family, but many people are attracted to power- it’s human nature. Especially for a woman to be attracted to a powerful man. That’s biology.

Nobody forced Prince William to marry Kate

So what if Kate was first attracted to William because he was the prince? She didn’t force him to marry her. They have to truly care about each other to make it through the ups and downs of a relationship. It may have started from an attraction to royalty, but you can’t build a successful relationship on that.

Kate has been married to William for eight years and they have three children, yet they still seem very happy. If all Kate wanted was to be a part of royalty, she would have grown sick of it by now. With all the pressure that public life brings, we would see some cracks. The same goes for Meghan. It shouldn’t matter who started the relationship. It really doesn’t matter if Kate or Meghan is a social climber, (we think they’re not) but, it doesn’t make a difference in the long run. They’re happy with their husbands, and that’s all that counts.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/why-everybody-is-wrong-about-kate-middleton-being-a-social-climber.html/

2019-06-09 08:09:39Z
52780311373403

Will Meghan Markle Have to Change Her Parenting Style Because of the Royal Family? - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Royal fans are overjoyed that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have finally welcomed their first child. The newborn, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, is absolutely perfect. On the day he was born, his father described him as being “to die for.”

Whenever a new baby is born into a royal family, it is always an exciting event. Royal betters speculate about the specific details for months on end, and before Meghan delivered the baby, there were many people who actually thought the Duke and Duchess of Sussex would be having a girl. We were pleasantly surprised when the news was announced that Meghan and Harry had, in fact, welcomed a baby boy, and suddenly, everyone was wondering what his name could be.

When it was found out what the newborn’s moniker was, there was talk over how fitting it was for the new royal baby. Meghan seems to have definite plans for how she is going to approach parenting, raising the question as to if she will have to change her parenting style because of the royal family.

Meghan Markle’s friend says she will be hands-on and strict

Meghan Markle | Samir Hussein/Samir Hussein/WireImage

According to Meghan’s close friend, actress Janina Gavankar, she will be a great mother. Although she is expected to be hands-on with Archie, she will also be strict. It is in keeping with Meghan’s personality that she will definitely be low-maintenance, just as her friend is predicting.

Janina revealed that she and Meghan have been talking about the journey of motherhood for over a decade, further proving that Meghan is just meant to be a mother. The actress said that Meghan is “practical,” which will be reflected in her parenting style.

The royal family has protocol for raising children

Everyone knows that parenthood involves making a lot of personal decisions. Each family chooses to raise children in their own unique way, doing things that they feel are right for their family, and making choices as they see fit. The royal family, however, takes a somewhat different approach.

Royal parents are expected to use a nanny to take care of their children, and there are many other rules as well. Boys are to wear shorts at all times, the child must be baptized, and senior members of the family tend to give their children traditional royal names. Prince William and Kate Middleton have followed just about every rule that is expected of them, however, Meghan and Harry seem to have other plans.

What rules have Meghan Markle and Prince Harry broken?

When it came to the birth of their baby, Meghan and Harry opted to do things their own way, and fans definitely admire them for it. Meghan neither gave birth at the Lindo Wing as Kate Middleton did nor did the couple emerge from the hospital with the newborn in their arms. Archie also has only one middle name as opposed to the typical two or three that royals have. Also, it was even thought that Meghan and Harry wouldn’t be enlisting the help of a nanny, something that is almost unheard of for royals.

Will Meghan Markle have to change her parenting style because of the royal family?

It does not appear that she will. Meghan likes to do things according to her own agenda, and it is not likely that she is going to change what she believes in when it comes to raising baby Archie. She and Harry are planning on giving the baby a “quiet” and “normal” life, and it is hard to imagine Meghan letting anyone tell her to do otherwise. The Duke and Duchess have specific plans for parenting, and we can’t wait to see how they surprise us next. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/will-meghan-markle-have-to-change-her-parenting-style-because-of-the-royal-family.html/

2019-06-09 06:55:06Z
52780311373403