Kamis, 20 Juni 2019

Close friend Dave Clark unarchives stunning, previously unreleased version of Freddie Mercury’s ‘Time Waits for No One’: Listen - Yahoo Entertainment

In October 1985, mere months after Queen’s iconic performance at Live Aid, Freddie Mercury was recruited by his dear friend, British Invasion pioneer Dave Clark, to record the track “In My Defence” for a star-studded concept album based on Clark's sci-fi/rock musical Time. The session at London’s Abbey Road Studios went so swimmingly that, Clark tells Yahoo Entertainment, Mercury asked him, “‘Have you got any other songs?’ I said, ‘Well, I have got the title track.’ And that was called ‘Time.’ I played it to him. He was totally committed, which is where this all came from. He was amazing.”

So, three months later, Mercury returned to Abbey Road to record that second song (which Clark co-wrote with John Christie), and Clark describes the day as absolutely magical. “Before any musicians came in, it was just Freddie and [session musician Mike Moran playing] piano. He sang, and it gave me goosebumps. Nobody was there. It was just amazing. I can't even explain it. Then of course, when everybody came in, we ended up with 48 tracks of backing vocals. … And the end result, with all the musicians and production, ended up at 96 tracks.”

But now, for the first time ever, Mercury’s original, pared-down “Time” — captured that day in January 1986 when Mercury was, as Clark puts it, still “buzzing” from his Live Aid triumph — is being released under the song’s full title, “Time Waits for No One,” stripping back those 96 tracks to a version with just one: Freddie Mercury.

Clark never forgot that moment, and he spent a decade trying to unearth Mercury’s lost vocal track. “I thought, ‘I'd love to hear the original performance,’ but I couldn't find it. It's because we did so many tracks. I sent my engineer down, and we went through [the vaults]. Couldn't find it. So I let it go. A few years later, I said, ‘Go on. Go through all the banks again.’”

Clark finally retrieved the audio from his tape archive last year and restored it at Moran’s studio in Buckinghamshire, England — though he sat on it for while longer, because he though it would be “wrong” to release it while the publicity campaign for the Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody was still in overdrive. Eventually, when the time was right, he surprised Queen manager Jim Beach with the track. “He came over to my house, and before we started talking, I said, ‘I've got something I'd like to show you that might make you smile.’ I didn't say what it was. He loved it.”

Clark also commissioned a brand-new video for the recording, cut from original negatives and unused, unprocessed 35mm film footage from the 1986 “Time” video shoot. Listening back to the recording and watching the new clip, Clark still gets goosebumps. “Even more so now,” he stresses. “Yeah, I think ‘time waits for no one,’ it applies to all of us, on whatever level. You could go and win the lottery tomorrow, or we don't know what's around the corner. It's not heavy in any way, it's just that we've all got to enjoy ourselves. The world's not in a great state. It's sad. You’ve just got to enjoy every moment.”

Clark first met Mercury about a decade before the Time sessions, and enjoyed every moment of the friendship that ensued. “I went to [Queen’s] first major concert in Hyde Park, in London [in 1976], which was huge. I stood in the wings. He came on in a leotard with black nail varnish and I thought, ‘What's this? Liza Minnelli?’ Then he opened his mouth and sang, and I went, ‘Wow.’ He was unbelievable, just unbelievable,” Clark recalls. “An incredible performer. Then, after the show, we all went with Elton [John] to Mr. Chow's, which was a big restaurant in London. We were just mates. And that was it.”

Their friendship truly blossomed later at Abbey Road, after Mercury eventually agreed to travel from Germany, where he was living at the time, to London to work on “In My Defence” and, later, “Time Waits for No One” — despite music-biz naysayers claiming that this would never happen.“The record company said, ‘No, you'll never get him.’ His management said, ‘You won't get him.’ But I'm a firm believer of going to the source,” Clark chuckles. “I knew Freddie's girlfriend, Mary Austin. She gave me his number in Munich. I phoned him up and said, ‘Look, Freddie, I've got a track I'd love you to hear.’ He said, ‘Well, I've read all about Time.’ We [already] had Stevie Wonder, Laurence Olivier, you name it; everybody was on the album. He said, ‘You've come a bit late!’ — which was typical Freddie. He said, ‘I'm quite happy to listen to it.’ I said, ‘Well, I'll fly over [to Munich]. If you don't like it, don't feel embarrassed. I wouldn't want you to do it. It's got to be something you're really passionate to do. I'll fly over, and we can have a drink or a bite to eat, and I'll fly back.’ That was it. He bit the bullet, as they say.

“It was amazing, because everybody said he would be a nightmare to work with. I'm very focused on what I want to do, and it's got to be right; Freddie is the same. The amazing thing was, I didn't agree with certain things, and he gave into it. He came up with things that I wasn't sure of, but we were working to make the best possible record. There was never any arguments or anything like that. He was amazing. It worked. …The friendship really developed then.”

Two years later, in April 1988, Clark staged a benefit concert, Give Time for AIDS, at London’s Dominion Theatre — the same West End stage where the “Time Waits for No One” video was shot — and Mercury participated. (“It was in the days when people didn't understand [AIDS]. They knocked it. It was like a leprosy, in a way,” Clark recalls.) It turned out to be one of Mercury’s last live performances. Three and a half years later, in November 1991, Mercury himself succumbed to AIDS. And Clark was at the bedside vigil. “I did see him right at the end,” Clark says softly, though he doesn’t “really want to get into that,” explaining, “I've done this [“Time Waits for No One”] for a tribute to Freddie. I don't want to get into [talking about] the end, because I think we're talking about Freddie when he's alive and the amazing contribution he made.”

Freddie Mercury, Dave Clark, and John Christie. (Photo: Dave Clark International)

However, Clark is willing to discuss the “horrific” way the tabloid press hounded Mercury in his final days. “All the nasty press, writing terrible things, they weren’t thinking about his loved ones and his family. They couldn't care less,” he grumbles. “But the thing about the press is, with all that bad press, he still had multimillion-selling records, because people loved him. That's what it's all about. … And I've got an opinion: It doesn't matter who you love or how you love, it's that you love. Freddie loved life. I think that was wonderful.

“There's one little thing when he passed away that really moved me,” Clark continues. “What really blew me away was, when Freddie died, all the taxis that went past his house turned their lights off. Now, these were really working-class, Cockney-type people, you know? I found that very moving. Also, when they were doing all the press and the television cameras were outside his house, I always remember there was this Cockney couple, a young guy and his girlfriend. And he said, ‘What do you think about him? He's gay.’ She said, ‘We love him!’ And so did the guy. He said, ‘We couldn't care less. He made us feel good. He made us happy.’ I think that's the important thing. … Music is as an emotion to move you. Either makes you feel happy, or sad, or whatever. With Freddie's music, it was always to make you feel good.”

Reflecting on the recent resurgence of love for Queen since the massive box-office success of Bohemian Rhapsody — perhaps the best revenge against all those vicious paparazzi and trolling reporters — Clark laughs, “When they got the Oscar and the BAFTA and everything else, I thought, ‘Freddie will be up there, smiling.’ I know what he'd say. … He would say, ‘F*** 'em all!’ That's what he would say.”

Clark has no doubt that if Mercury had lived, he and the Queen legend would have worked on more music together. In fact, they even recorded a demo of another Time tune, “Born to Rock'n'Roll,” but the album spot had already been promised to Time star Cliff Richard. Sadly, Clark can’t find the Mercury demo now, although rough audio of a live duet version of the song between Mercury and Richard, from the above-mentioned Give Time for AIDS charity gala, exists online.

“Cliff wanted to do [“Born to Rock'n'Roll”]; I didn't tell him that Freddie wanted to do it, so I couldn't renege on it. Freddie said to me, ‘Leave it for a year or so, Dave. I'll come in and rerecord it,’ because we did a demo for it, and it was amazing,” Clark reveals. “We would have done it. Yeah, we would have done a lot more things if the time had been on our side. … There was all the time in the world to do it, at that stage. But that was it. That's life.”

Freddie Mercury’s “Time Waits for No One” can be streamed and downloaded here.

Read more from Yahoo Entertainment:

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/listen-to-a-stunning-previously-unreleased-version-of-freddie-mercurys-time-waits-for-no-one-073117303.html

2019-06-20 07:31:00Z
52780317920263

Kate Middleton or Meghan Markle: Which Duchess Had to Give Up More for the Royal Family? - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle are the envy of women all around the world. They’re both married to real-life princes. They both reside in castles: Kate in Kensington Palace and Meghan will be splitting her time between Buckingham Palace and Frogmore Cottage. They both have beautiful children: Kate, a mother to three and Meghan, a new mother to one

Both duchesses, without a doubt, have beautiful lives. Lives filled to the brim with love and royal work to occupy their time. Even so, both women also had to give up quite a bit to be where they are today. So, who do you think gave up more: the Duchess of Sussex or the Duchess of Cambridge?

What did Kate Middleton leave behind for Prince William?

Kate Middleton
Kate Middleton | Samir Hussein/Samir Hussein/WireImage

Kate and Prince William tied the knot in April 2011 — eight years ago.  Since getting married, they’ve been through quite a lot! Kate made the move from British commoner to a beloved duchess. William went from single guy to doting husband. The pair grew beautifully together, ending up with three beautiful children: Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis. It’s really been a fairytale brought to life.

But to get to where she is today, Kate did have to leave some things behind. For one, being a British commoner, Kate lived a very peaceful life, one she had to give up to walk by William’s side. While they were dating, she got a taste of the royal life. It overwhelmed her, leading to two brief breaks in their relationship. 

It wasn’t just her privacy she gave up either. She also sacrificed her independence. During the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s brief separation in 2007, Kate was seen living it up. She was photographed at many events, and her friends got to enjoy watching her bloom and achieve comfort in her own skin.

She even signed up for a women’s only boat race. One she trained very hard to win. Once their relationship got back on track, she pulled out…confirming her friends worst fears. Kate was losing herself for the sake of true love.

“There was, however, one casualty of this romantic reunion: Kate herself.” – Andrew Morton (William and Catherine)

What did Meghan Markle sacrifice to become a duchess?

Meghan was a successful Hollywood starlet when she retired. She withdrew from a show she had become a fan favorite in and left her acting dreams behind. The controversial duchess worked extremely hard to make it in Hollywood, to walk away from her hard-earned dream must have been difficult. But with love on the line, who could blame her?

Without a doubt, it’s Meghan’s career that was of the hardest hits, but it wasn’t the only one. Unlike Kate, Meghan hailed from a completely different world. Sure, they’re both commoners, but turning an American celebrity into a British Royal is no easy feat. While it’s clear Meghan gets some leeway, in some sense, she also had to leave the lax rules and regulations attached to her nationality behind as well.

Then there are the more “material items.” When Meghan moved across the world to stand beside her prince, she sold her condo — her own personal space. What’s even worse is that she couldn’t take her beloved pup with her! Not to mention all of her friends.

Which duchess gave up more for the royal family?

Both the Duchess of Sussex and the Duchess of Cambridge had to give up a lot of independence, to claim their royal titles. Kate lived a simple but thriving life out of the spotlight; one the traded in to stand in the limelight with her hubby. Meghan exchanged her celebrity status for royal status. While she was accustomed to the fame and attention, being a royal comes with a set of rules that pretty much turned her life on its head!

Katen was already a British resident so the move, while overwhelming, didn’t necessarily mean leaving her friends and family behind. Meghan, on the other hand, has to cross the seas to be with her besties. It really is hard to decide who lost more, especially when you take into consideration Kate’s friend’s commentary. At least both women seem unbelievably happy and it’s unlikely that either regrets their life-altering decision.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/kate-middleton-or-meghan-markle-which-duchess-had-to-give-up-more-for-the-royal-family.html/

2019-06-20 06:31:07Z
52780315661351

Rabu, 19 Juni 2019

Prince William and Kate Middleton's Convoy Being Criticized By Family Of Elderly Woman Seriously Injured In Crash - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

More details have been emerging about the crash involving Prince William and Kate Middleton‘s convoy that seriously injured an elderly woman and her family has a strong message for the royals.

The accident occurred as the couple was traveling from London to Windsor on Monday afternoon. It is believed that a royal protection officer on a motorcycle hit the woman, identified as 83-year-old Irene Mayor. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have contacted the woman but now her family is lashing out. Here’s more on what they had to say about the crash as well as an update on Mayor’s condition.

Prince William Kate Middleton
Prince William Kate Middleton | Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)

Woman’s condition after crash

At this time, the IOPC is still investigating the crash and released the following statement.

“We are investigating the circumstances surrounding a collision involving a marked police motorcycle attached to the Royalty and Specialist Protection Command and a woman pedestrian on Upper Richmond Road, Richmond, southwest London at 12:50 p.m. on Monday 17 June.”

Scotland Yard added that Mayor was taken to the hospital in critical condition.

Mayor’s daughter, Fiona, spoke to the MailOnline and revealed that her mother suffered several injuries including a broken pelvis and is currently in serious but stable condition.

“She’s got lots of injuries,” Fiona said. “They are just keeping her stable at the moment.”

Her family blasts royals’ convoy

Mayor’s siblings spoke out about the crash as well and slammed the royal convoy.

Prince William Kate Middleton
Prince William Kate Middleton | Anwar Hussein/WireImage

“The police outriders have to slow down. My sister is lying in a hospital bed and she could have been killed. She could so easily have been killed,” her sister, Joyce Shore, said. “I do like the royals, but the way my sister’s life has been endangered is completely unacceptable. These outriders need to slow down. But it will still go on. I doubt anything will change just because a lady speaks out over concern for her sister.”

The 86-year-old Shore was overcome with emotion at the thought that her sister might not pull through this.

“She is just an ordinary lady who minds her own business and then this happens,” Shore said as she wiped away tears. “She had been shopping and she was on her way home. She had been on a bus. She had been crossing the road. Those police motorbikes don’t have to go so close to the curb.”

Mayor’s brother added that his family has already hired lawyers to “look after” his sibling.

Prince Wiliam and Middleton did not see the collision but were later notified about what happened.

“The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were deeply concerned to hear about the accident. Their Royal Highnesses have sent their best wishes to Irene and her family and will stay in touch throughout every stage of her recovery,” a Kensington Palace spokesperson said.

The royals have sent flowers to the hospital and hope to visit Mayor when she is ready.

Read more: Prince William and Kate Middleton’s Morning Routine With Their Kids Is Nothing Like You’d Expect

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/prince-william-and-kate-middletons-convoy-being-criticized-by-family-of-elderly-woman-seriously-injured-in-crash.html/

2019-06-19 15:22:44Z
52780317088664

Jordyn Woods Cozies Up To Another Kardashian Lover After Tristan Thompson Cheating Scandal - Hollywood Life

It’s been 4 months since Jordyn Woods admitted to kissing Khloe Kardashian’s ex, Tristan Thompson, but on June 18, she was spotted out with yet another Kardashian ex-flame.

It looks like Jordyn Woods, 21, has been kicking it with yet another Kardashian ex. When publicist Elizabeth Woods shared a set of photos with the social media maven, fans couldn’t help but notice that Ray J, 38, the infamous ex of Kim Kardashian, 38, was seen in one of the photos! The Instagram slideshow post featured a number of high-profile celebrities, but five photos in — there was Ray J with his arm around 21-year-old Jordyn. You can see the post for yourself, below!

The surprising photo comes one day after Ray J made headlines after his sex tape with Kim was shockingly brought up at the 2019 MTV Movie & TV Awards. It’s been 16 years since Kim K and then-boyfriend Ray J made a sex tape, and 12 years since it was leaked. Yet MTV Movie and TV Awards host Zachary Levi decided to beat the dead horse by joking about it all these years later because the “One Wish” singer happened to be in the house for the ceremony. However, Ray J is clearly ready to put the tape behind him, because he flipped the bird to the camera after hearing the joke.

We can only wonder what Kim thinks about her ex kicking it with Jordyn. It was in February of 2019 that Jordyn had a highly-publicized fallout with the Kar-Jenners,  after Tristan Thompson kissed her on the lips while leaving his after-party in Los Angeles on Feb. 17. This was according to Jordyn’s side of the story, which she told in a March 1 interview on Jada Pinkett-Smith’s Facebook show, Red Table Talk. Jordyn denied that sex (or a rumored lap dance) was involved, but the shocking confession was enough to forever change her relationship with Khloe and her sisters. Given that Tristan was the long-time boyfriend to Khloe Kardashian, 34, the Kardashian clan was simply unable to forgive her.

You can see Jordyn and Ray-J posting up together five photos into the slideshow. The new set of photos appeared to be from a film set, as Jordyn and her famous friends are going to be part of the television series, Hip Hop Squares. Jordyn posted her own clip from set where she stunned in a sparkling, lime green dress. “Filmin somethin fun today,” she wrote. Rick Ross, Michael Blackson and Golden Barbie were also on set that day.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://hollywoodlife.com/2019/06/19/jordyn-woods-ray-j-tristan-thompson-scandal-pic/

2019-06-19 13:58:00Z
52780316961764

Pixar Changed Hollywood, but Has the Studio Lost a Step? - The Ringer

Despite finding the perfect coda for the Toy Story franchise in 2010’s excellent, Best Picture–nominated Toy Story 3, Pixar returns to the world of Woody and Buzz Lightyear with the release of Toy Story 4 on Friday. As always, the film carries some intense themes that’ll go over the head of most kids and make the adults in the theater overly emotional, as the toys reckon with the burdens of immortality and the creeping realization they’ll outlive all the humans who cherish them. Toy Story 4, then, is Classic Pixar: heavy yet lighthearted, emotionally resonant, and delivered through gorgeously rendered computer animation. But the film’s treatise on immortality works beyond its narrative structure; it’s also a reflection on the Toy Story franchise and Pixar as a whole.

Pixar is, especially for those fortunate enough to grow up around the time it started with 1995’s Toy Story, a rare company. From a technical perspective, the studio was the pioneer for computer-generated 3D animation; the original Toy Story was the first full-length, computer-animated feature film ever made, and every subsequent Pixar release has looked even better, reflecting the advancements in the field. On a storytelling level, the studio’s greatest films have elevated an entire genre, uniting fun children’s stories with mature reflections on things like grief (Up), friendship (Toy Story), marriage (The Incredibles), and the messy trials of growing up (Inside Out). Like Japan’s Studio Ghibli, Pixar has been lauded as more than just a producer of good children’s entertainment—it’s one of the most influential and revered studios on the planet. Pixar’s 15 Oscars for its feature films—nine of which have come in the Best Animated Feature category, first installed in 2002—and impressive box office record over the course of 20 films is further proof of that.

In America, at least, the stratification of animated film has been clear: Pixar on top, and then everybody else. While Disney’s run of animated hits continued into the late ’90s with movies like Pocahontas and The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Pixar was proving that the genre didn’t solely need to cater to kids, that it could instead treat kids with respect and intelligence and appeal to adults in the process. In 1998, A Bug’s Life eclipsed Mulan at the box office, and from there Pixar didn’t look back. And though the studio did lean on a sequel, Toy Story 2, for its biggest hit up to that point, even that movie’s development process was a testament to Pixar’s commitment to its own ideas: As studios like Disney made the straight-to-DVD sequel standard practice for animated movies, Pixar pushed for a theatrical release, a move that paid off. And on the back of that success, the studio then went on an unbelievable run: Between the release of Toy Story 2 in 1999 and Toy Story 3 in 2010, Pixar rattled off seven consecutive films based on original conceits, including all-timers like Finding Nemo, Ratatouille, The Incredibles, Wall-E, and Up. Meanwhile, other animated studios were finding only sporadic success and, more pointedly, wringing as much as possible out of those successes. DreamWorks Animation’s Shrek, for instance, eventually yielded three sequels, two holiday specials, and a Puss in Boots spinoff; 20th Century Fox’s Ice Age yielded four sequels; Illumination’s Despicable Me yielded two sequels and a spinoff on a race of yellow helpers who can’t even speak English.

But the Pixar of the 2010s has been a different beast. The studio is still capable of producing exceptional films (Inside Out, Coco) and perhaps more importantly for its bottom line, stellar box office returns. But in the last decade, Pixar’s slate has been heavily composed of the thing it once avoided: sequels. Including Toy Story 4, seven of Pixar’s last 11 movies have been sequels, the others being Toy Story 3, Cars 2, Monsters University, Finding Dory, Cars 3, and Incredibles 2. Not all of these sequels have been underwhelming—again, Toy Story 4 is quite good, and as of this writing, holds a 98 percent on Rotten Tomatoes—but more often than not, they haven’t lived up their source material. (The less said about Cars 2, the better.)

Serious issues within the company have also come to light during this period. In 2018, Pixar cofounder John Lasseter left the company after a report on his inappropriate behavior toward employees. And while Rashida Jones is a credited cowriter on Toy Story 4, in 2017 she left the production over concerns that women and people of color weren’t receiving “equal creative voice” at the studio. Indeed, Pixar’s initial brain trust—Pete Docter, Andrew Stanton, Brad Bird, Joe Ranft, and Lee Unkrich, along with Lasseter—is entirely male and white. Overall, that speaks to what a Variety column in 2018 by a former female employee outlined: Pixar has long been a “boy’s club” that’s frequently prevented women from advancing to significant roles within the company.

While the recent spate of sequels have still produced impressive box office returns—2018’s Incredibles 2 and 2016’s Finding Dory are the first- and third-highest grossing Pixar movies ever, both exceeding $1 billion globally—they have come with a decline in the sort of accolades that used to be so familiar for the company. Pixar has won the Best Animated Feature Oscar just two times in the past six years, a slump that would’ve been unfathomable just a decade ago. (Even wilder: Finding Dory was completely shut out of the category in 2017.) There was a time when Pixar’s dominance among critics, audiences, and awards bodies felt like a given—a guarantee so long as they had something on the schedule. As the years have passed though, it seems that Pixar’s early critical success was part of a golden age, a finite period defined by unparalleled brilliance and an admirable devotion to original ideas.

In the 2014 book about Pixar, Creativity Inc., cofounder Ed Catmull decries sequels as “a sort of creative bankruptcy,” adding that Pixar aspires to have a ratio of two originals for every sequel. In reality, though, the inverse of that has happened in the 2010s. It’s a distressing circumstance that reflects Hollywood’s not-always-successful propensity to mine established IP via sequels, reboots, remakes, and adaptations of books, video games, viral tweets, and so on. Pixar’s early successes were tantalizing enough to pursue more (admittedly stellar) box office returns. But doing so has come at the expense of original ideas, and as the years have gone on, the balance has shifted, and Pixar has lost a bit of what made them so revolutionary in the late ’90s and early 2000s. Instead of functioning like an American version of Studio Ghibli—which has never in its history conjured up a sequel—Pixar has recently opted to mirror the animated efforts of Disney, the company that acquired it in 2006 for a reported $7.4 billion.

Going forward, there seems to be at least a shred of acknowledgement on Pixar’s behalf that it’s gone astray. Its franchises will continue to expand—plans are already set for a Monsters Inc. spinoff series and a bunch of short films centered on Forky, the sentient, disfigured spork who questions his own existence in Toy Story 4—but will do so on Disney’s new streaming service, Disney+. This may be the solution Pixar needs, as it ought to keep the studio flush while also allowing it to get back to what it does best on the big screen.

Elsewhere, Pixar has made small but encouraging steps to improve its products and its own culture. This year, the company hired its second-ever female director, Domee Shi, who did the adorable animated short Bao, which was also the first Pixar short directed by a woman (it took only 20 years). And in the near future, Pixar will reverse course on the feature film front with a renewed focus on original productions. After Toy Story 4, all its movies in development are based on new conceits. The first of these efforts will come in 2020 with Onward, a flick combining fantasy with suburbia that was teased in May.

Two minutes of footage isn’t much to glean from, but at the very least, the premise makes it sound like Classic Pixar may return once again. The return of the trophies—and adult tears—ought to be forthcoming.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.theringer.com/movies/2019/6/19/18684544/pixar-sequels-toy-story-4

2019-06-19 12:25:44Z
52780316530761

Prince William and Kate's motorcade injures elderly woman in crash - AOL

LONDON, June 19 (Reuters) - An elderly woman is in hospital with serious injuries after she was struck by a police motorbike escort for Britain's Prince William and his wife Kate.

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's convoy was traveling from London to Windsor on Monday afternoon when the accident occurred.

The woman, Irene Mayor, who is in her 80s, is in a serious but stable condition, police said.

The Sun newspaper, citing witnesses, said the escort was on the wrong side of the road clearing traffic for the couple's convoy when the incident happened.

Britain's police watchdog, the Independent Office for Police Conduct, said it was investigating.

20 PHOTOS

Royal family at the Royal Ascot

See Gallery

The Duke of Cambridge (left), the Duchess of Cambridge, Queen Elizabeth II, the Duchess of Cornwall, King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands and Queen Maxima of the Netherlands attending day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

Princess Eugenie of York (left) and Princess Beatrice of York during day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse. (Photo by Mike Egerton/PA Images via Getty Images)

Queen Elizabeth II (left), King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands, Queen Maxima of the Netherlands, the Duke of Cambridge and the Duchess of Cambridge attending day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

The Duchess of Cambridge (centre), Johnny Weatherby (right) and Zara Tindall (left) attending day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse. (Photo by Jonathan Brady/PA Images via Getty Images)

The Princess Royal (left) and the Countess of Wessex during day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse. (Photo by Mike Egerton/PA Images via Getty Images)

ASCOT, ENGLAND - JUNE 18: Emma Weymouth and Lady Kitty Spencer attend day 1 of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse on June 18, 2019 in Ascot, England. (Photo by David M. Benett/Getty Images for Ascot Racecourse)

The Princess Royal, Anne (fourth left), The Duchess of Cambridge, Duke of Cambridge, Queen Elizabeth II, King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands and Queen Maxima of the Netherlands attending day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

Queen Elizabeth II during day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

Britain's Queen Elizabeth II (2R) rise with Dutch King Willem-Alexander (L) and Queen Maxima (R) and Britain's Prince Andrew, Duke of York, (2L) as they arrive on day one of the Royal Ascot horse racing meet, in Ascot, west of London, on June 18, 2019. - The five-day meeting is one of the highlights of the horse racing calendar. Horse racing has been held at the famous Berkshire course since 1711 and tradition is a hallmark of the meeting. Top hats and tails remain compulsory in parts of the course while a daily procession of horse-drawn carriages brings the Queen to the course. (Photo by Adrian DENNIS / AFP) (Photo credit should read ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP/Getty Images)

Princess Eugenie in Windsor Great Park where members of the Royal family swap from cars to horse-drawn carriages on their journey from Windsor Castle to Ascot Racecourse.

The Duchess of Cambridge in Windsor Great Park where members of the Royal family swap from cars to horse-drawn carriages on their journey from Windsor Castle to Ascot Racecourse.

The Princess Royal in Windsor Great Park where members of the Royal family swap from cars to horse-drawn carriages on their journey from Windsor Castle to Ascot Racecourse.

Queen Elizabeth II in Windsor Great Park where members of the Royal family swap from cars to horse-drawn carriages on their journey from Windsor Castle to Ascot Racecourse.

The Duchess of Cambridge (left) and the Duchess of Cornwall in Windsor Great Park where members of the Royal family swap from cars to horse-drawn carriages on their journey from Windsor Castle to Ascot Racecourse.

Queen Elizabeth II in Windsor Great Park where members of the Royal family swap from cars to horse-drawn carriages on their journey from Windsor Castle to Ascot Racecourse.

Queen Elizabeth II during day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

The Duchess of Cornwall (centre), the Prince of Wales (third left) and the Duke of Cambridge during day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

The Duke of Cambridge (left), the Duchess of Cambridge, Queen Elizabeth II, the Duchess of Cornwall, King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands and Queen Maxima of the Netherlands attending day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

The Duke of Cambridge (centre) arriving by carriage during day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

The Duchess of Cornwall (centre), the Prince of Wales (third left) and the Duke of Cambridge during day one of Royal Ascot at Ascot Racecourse.

HIDE CAPTION

SHOW CAPTION

of

SEE ALL

BACK TO SLIDE

The royal couple were "deeply concerned and saddened" to hear of the accident, according to a spokeswoman, and a member of their staff visited the woman and delivered flowers.

"Their Royal Highnesses have sent their very best regards to Irene and her family and will stay in touch throughout every stage of her recovery," the spokeswoman said.

The accident took place when the couple were on their way to Windsor for the St George's Chapel service commemorating the Order of the Garter.

In January, a woman was injured in a car crash involving Prince Philip near the royal family's Sandringham Estate.

The Land Rover that Philip was driving flipped over. The 98-year-old was uninjured and voluntarily surrendered his driver's license soon after.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2019/06/19/prince-william-and-kates-convoy-escort-injures-elderly-woman-in-crash/23752563/

2019-06-19 10:01:34Z
CBMihAFodHRwczovL3d3dy5hb2wuY29tL2FydGljbGUvZW50ZXJ0YWlubWVudC8yMDE5LzA2LzE5L3ByaW5jZS13aWxsaWFtLWFuZC1rYXRlcy1jb252b3ktZXNjb3J0LWluanVyZXMtZWxkZXJseS13b21hbi1pbi1jcmFzaC8yMzc1MjU2My_SAQA