Selasa, 14 Januari 2020

Meghan did not dial into royal crisis talks with Queen, source says - CNN

Queen agrees on 'period of transition' for Harry and Meghan
In the end, the Sussexes decided it was not necessary for her to join the discussion, the source said.
The meeting was held at the Queen's Sandringham Estate in Norfolk, some 100 miles north of London, and Meghan is currently in Canada, with the couple's baby son Archie.
In a statement issued after the meeting, the Queen said the family would have preferred the couple to "remain full-time working members of the royal family," but that they "respect and understand" Harry and Meghan's "wish to live a more independent life."
The Queen has agreed to a "period of transition" while details of their new role are hammered out, the family announced.
Harry and Meghan will spend time in both the UK and Canada during this period. The couple revealed last week that they wish to step down as senior British royals and live part-time in North America.
Who will pay for Harry and Meghan's security? Canada says discussions are underway
The Queen said she had agreed that Harry and Meghan could split their time between the UK and Canada but that "complex matters" would have to be resolved. The monarch added that she had ordered final plans to be drawn up in the next few days.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told a local television station Monday that discussions are ongoing over who will pay the costs of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's security for their proposed new life in the country.
Trudeau said "there is a general feeling of appreciation for the Sussexes" in Canada, but talks continue as to the exact arrangements.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiTWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8xNC91ay9tZWdoYW4tY3Jpc2lzLWNhbGwtZ2JyLXNjbGktaW50bC9pbmRleC5odG1s0gFRaHR0cHM6Ly9hbXAuY25uLmNvbS9jbm4vMjAyMC8wMS8xNC91ay9tZWdoYW4tY3Jpc2lzLWNhbGwtZ2JyLXNjbGktaW50bC9pbmRleC5odG1s?oc=5

2020-01-14 12:35:00Z
52780542675596

His Grandmother Is Canada’s Queen, but Harry Won’t Get Much Special Treatment - The New York Times

OTTAWA — Queen Elizabeth II may have blessed plans by Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, to become part-time residents of Canada, but the monarch’s status as the country’s formal head of state doesn’t mean the couple can expect any special treatment on many fronts.

When it comes to immigration, taxation and even what they call themselves, Harry and Meghan will be no different than any other newcomers to Canada.

But one area where they could receive unique consideration is their personal security.

The couple, known formally as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, have offered little detail about their plans, including where they intend to live in Canada, how much of their time they will spend in the country and how they plan to become independent of funds set aside by Britain for its royals.

But when they do make their move, the duke and duchess won’t get a V.I.P. pass through immigration.

“There are no provisions in the Citizenship Act that confer Canadian citizenship status to members of the royal family,” Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, a government department, said in a statement. “In order to become legal permanent residents of Canada, they would need to apply through our normal immigration processes. However, members of the royal family are not required to seek authorization to come to and stay in Canada as visitors.”

There was widespread speculation in Canada’s immigration community that the couple would be just visiting rather than calling Canada home to avoid a number of complexities.

“I doubt very much they would apply for permanent residency,” said Sergio R. Karas, an immigration lawyer in Toronto. “That would not be a good option for them.”

As visitors, the couple can remain in Canada for up to six months without any sort of special visa. The catch, however, is they wouldn’t be able to work in the country, where coins and $20 bills bear likenesses of the queen, if that is indeed part of their financial freedom plan.

Helen Park, an immigration lawyer with the Dentons law firm in Vancouver, British Columbia, said that while they couldn’t seek employment, they could manage businesses based outside Canada while there as visitors.

But if they decide to become residents of Canada with the right to work in the country, there are several possible channels the couple could explore of varying difficulty and plausibility.

The easiest, but perhaps least likely, avenue would be for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s immigration minister to grant them residency on “compassionate grounds.”

“But is Harry going to say, ‘My grandmother is chasing me out of England’?” Mr. Karas said.

The government, Ms. Park said, could also declare them to be people of significant economic social or cultural benefit to Canada — a measure commonly used for prominent artists or literary figures.

Either form of queue cutting might prompt a political backlash.

While Canada is generally welcoming to immigrants, the process is expensive and time-consuming. As a result, many recent immigrants might resent any jumping in line by the royal couple. A large percentage of new Canadians include people from places like India, where the British monarchy is still strongly associated with colonial repression and is deeply unpopular.

Meghan’s past life in Canada could, in theory, also provide the couple a way into Canada as residents. An American, she lived in Toronto for several years while filming the American television legal drama “Suits,” when she was known as Meghan Markle. While her immigration status during that time is not public information, Canada has a special visa provision for actors working on foreign film and television productions in the country.

Ms. Park said that some of her actor clients had used their time in the country to obtain residency. If — and Ms. Park noted that it’s a big if — Meghan took that step, she could then sponsor Harry for residency.

Regardless of their immigration status, the couple may face tax issues in Canada. Heather L. Evans, the executive director of the Canadian Tax Foundation, a research group, said there was no hard and fast rule for determining who is a resident for tax purposes. Instead, she said, “individual facts and circumstances are important, especially in cases of dual residents.”

Courts, she said, have found that in some cases, people who spend less than half of the year in Canada are still residents for taxation purposes.

Even murkier is the status of the duke and duchess’s royal titles if they make Canada home. In 1919, Canada’s Parliament put an end to citizens and residents being able to accept noble titles from Britain with a resolution that was affirmed twice more, as recently as 1988.

Conrad M. Black, the former press baron, had to give up his Canadian citizenship to become Baron Black of Crossharbour. There is, however, no precedent for how the resolution, which some argue is of limited legal force, would apply to a member of the royal family moving to Canada.

In a country where there is sometimes grousing about the cost of security for the prime minister, the question of who will pay to protect Harry, Meghan and their son, Archie, has been widely raised. On Monday, Mr. Trudeau said that was one of many questions that remain to be resolved.

“We are obviously supportive of their reflections but have responsibilities in that as well,” he said, referring to security. “We’re not entirely sure what the final decisions will be.”

Currently, Canada covers the cost of the security provided to the couple by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police because Harry and Meghan’s official status in Britain makes them “internationally protected persons” under Canadian law. Kent Roach, a professor of law at the University of Toronto, said that after withdrawing from official life, Meghan and Harry would lose that status.

But citing news media estimates that their annual security cost will be about 2 million Canadian dollars, or about $1.5 million, Mr. Roach anticipates that the government-funded guard will remain.

“Strict legal definitions will in the end not matter that much in this matter, especially if the cost of protection is, as reported, less than $2 million,” he said. “Canada has received that much worth in good press already.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDEvMTQvd29ybGQvY2FuYWRhL2hhcnJ5LW1lZ2hhbi1jYW5hZGEtcXVlZW4tcm95YWxzLmh0bWzSAVlodHRwczovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzE0L3dvcmxkL2NhbmFkYS9oYXJyeS1tZWdoYW4tY2FuYWRhLXF1ZWVuLXJveWFscy5hbXAuaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-01-14 10:00:00Z
52780542675596

Trudeau: Harry and Meghan's Canada move still needs to be worked out - CNBC

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex gesture during their visit to Canada House in thanks for the warm Canadian hospitality and support they received during their recent stay in Canada, on January 7, 2020 in London, England. (Photo by DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS - WPA Pool/Getty Images)

WPA Pool

Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, might have won the approval of the queen to move to Canada, but the country's prime minister said there are "still lots of discussions to have" over the plans.

Speaking to Canadian television network Global News on Monday, Justin Trudeau said there were still details to iron, both in the U.K. and Canada, including security costs.

"There are still a lot of decisions to be taken by the Royal Family, by the Sussexes themselves as to what level of engagement they choose to have," Trudeau said. "We are obviously supportive of their reflections but have responsibilities in that as well."

"We're not entirely sure what the final decisions will be," he added. Trudeau said the federal government had not been consulted about the move up until now and that the costs would have to be assessed.

"I think most Canadians are very supportive of having royals be here, but how that looks and what kind of costs are involved, there are still lots of discussions to have," Trudeau said. "There is a general feeling of appreciation for the Sussexes."

Royal showdown

Trudeau's comments came after a royal showdown Monday afternoon with senior royals gathered in the queen's Norfolk estate, Sandringham, to discuss Meghan and Harry's shock announcement last week that they were to step back from their positions as "senior royals." The couple want to work to become financially independent and split their time between the U.K. and Canada.

Harry had face-to-face talks with the queen, Prince Charles and Prince William with Meghan reportedly joining the discussions by phone from Canada.

The queen, who was reportedly not consulted ahead of the announcement and was said to be disappointed by the decision, issued a statement in which she said a "period of transition" had been agreed with Harry and Meghan.

"My family and I are entirely supportive of Harry and Meghan's desire to create a new life as a young family. Although we would have preferred them to remain full-time working Members of the Royal Family, we respect and understand their wish to live a more independent life as a family while remaining a valued part of my family."

"Harry and Meghan have made clear that they do not want to be reliant on public funds in their new lives," the statement noted, adding: "It has therefore been agreed that there will be a period of transition in which the Sussexes will spend time in Canada and the U.K."

Details over how the couple will achieve financial autonomy and who will foot the bill for their security retinue are still unclear. The queen ended her statement noting that there were "complex matters for my family to resolve, and there is some more work to be done, but I have asked for final decisions to be reached in the coming days."

The couple had spent Christmas on Vancouver Island and Meghan, who has previously lived in Canada, is now reportedly back in British Columbia with the couple's son, Archie.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuYmMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDEvMTQvdHJ1ZGVhdS1oYXJyeS1hbmQtbWVnaGFucy1jYW5hZGEtbW92ZS1zdGlsbC1uZWVkcy10by1iZS13b3JrZWQtb3V0Lmh0bWzSAWtodHRwczovL3d3dy5jbmJjLmNvbS9hbXAvMjAyMC8wMS8xNC90cnVkZWF1LWhhcnJ5LWFuZC1tZWdoYW5zLWNhbmFkYS1tb3ZlLXN0aWxsLW5lZWRzLXRvLWJlLXdvcmtlZC1vdXQuaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-01-14 07:38:00Z
52780542675596

Selena Gomez: Rare | Review - Pitchfork

Selena Gomez was reborn from a hermetically-sealed fantasyland back into reality when, in 2015, she released her second solo record, Revival. It was the pop star’s beginning of a transition away from Disney incorruptibility towards songwriting that better represented the crossroads at which she found herself. Unlike the overproduced electropop of her 2013 debut, Stars Dance, Revival reflected her expanding sexuality, power, and interest in telling her own stories; Gomez actualized these objectives by posing nearly nude on the album cover, serving among its executive producers, and working with specific songwriters to help translate her experiences. As she proclaimed on the title track, it was her “time to butterfly.”

Over the next five years, Gomez’s journey towards emancipation would be challenged by serious struggles with anxiety, depression, and chronic illness that sidelined her music career and threatened her life. But in 2017, the same year she underwent a risky kidney transplant due to complications from the autoimmune disease lupus, Gomez shared a series of genre-curious singles including the Talking Heads-samplingBad Liar.” After checking the cultural pulse, the then most-followed woman on Instagram logged off, removing herself from the public eye once more. Besides popping up for the occasional movie role or fashion collaboration, Gomez focused on herself. “I just needed to let my old self go,” Gomez told Zane Lowe this month.

When Gomez shared the ballad “Lose You to Love Me” last fall, it seemed like the work she put into her physical and emotional wellness had clicked. The song looks at the ways she lost herself in a relationship and solemnly promises to never make that mistake again. While dropping hints at which supposedly “Sorry” singer had been dragging her down, Gomez reclaimed her own narrative. Her anguished soul-searching struck a nerve: “Lose You to Love Me” became Gomez’s first Billboard No. 1. Though the song’s drama is an exception, its moral of losing love and gaining self is the guiding ethos of her third record, Rare. While none of these 13 songs attempt the subtle weirdness of “Bad Liar” and the emotional thesis—self-love!—can be a bit one-note, Rare is the 27-year-old’s most cohesive record to date. It feels spiritually in tune with the woman who once cheerfully told Vogue that people would be surprised to learn how much she loves “depressing things.”

But Rare’s celebration of autonomy, resilience, and growth is overwhelmingly upbeat. After waving goodbye to a lover who does not respect her worth on the blissed-out self-titled opener, Gomez cleanses her heart with an electro-pop party on “Dance Again.” Dancing through pain is by now a tried-and-true motif in pop music, but the sentiment holds extra weight for Gomez, who undoubtedly knows from her lupus how it feels to be powerless over your body. But Rare doesn’t dwell on heavy realities like chronic illness or the ice-cold grip of depression or, really, any sadness lingering after heartache. When Gomez looks back on toxic relationships wracked with mistrust or self-sabotaging anxiety spirals, her perspective is more grateful than regretful, as if to say that everything in life is a valuable lesson.

Gomez’s biggest hurdle as a musician has long been her voice. Low and breathy, her understated vocals are better suited for intimate contemplation than big, belted catharsis. For the first time, Gomez seems to have a grasp on her range and mainly sticks to a husky, bedroom-eyes murmur instead of attempting bravado. Her best performance arrives on the muted, throbbing “Vulnerable.” Though the wordplay can be a bit heavy-handed—“If I let you cross my finish line, then would you wanna make it?”—Gomez sounds firm and assured even when she dips into a whisper. Guided by a vast team of songwriters and producers including Swedish duo Mattman & Robin, Simon Says, and Finneas (of the Eilish brood), Gomez dips her toes into some du jour sounds: “Ring” does a diet-“Havana” with a “Smooth” riff thrown in for good measure; “Fun” aims for a “Bad Liar” redux with a snappy bassline, handclaps, and bubbly frivolity; “Cut You Off” plays with downtempo funk and a familiar yoo-oo-oo chorus. Notably, the songwriting duo of Julia Michaels and Justin Tranter, whose melodic playfulness was all over Revival, only appear together on “Lose You” and its clubby companion single “Look At Her Now.”

But Gomez’s malleability can also be her downfall. Though she has a writing credit on every song, a majority of the tracks on Rare’s second half feel impersonal and underwhelming. These songs feel like they could be sung by anyone, and you can’t help but wonder what Gomez saw in them. On “People You Know,” she avoids confronting any real feelings of regret by wallowing beneath a frigid, tiptoeing beat and stale chorus. The trumpet-tinged kiss-off “Kinda Crazy” feels totally inconsequential. Any reference to the relationship-in-question’s halcyon days is so submerged in tired figures of speech about fire and water that their actual separation feels anticlimactic. What is meant to be a seductive liaison on “Crowded Room”—which features a middling appearance from rapper 6LACK and borrows a feeling from Cassie circa 2006—comes off as lethargic and forced.

Rare’s insipid gear shift culminates with its closer, “A Sweeter Place.” Despite his brief contribution, the song feels dominated by the melodramatic-stoner aura of its guest, Kid Cudi, all Auto-Tune and heavy synths. If only the song focused on unpacking one of Rare’s most compelling—albeit cheesy—lines: “Holding hands with the darkness and knowing my heart is allowed.” Sadly, this intriguing notion of finding dignity in depression is erased by a painfully vapid chorus: “Is there a place where I can hide away/Red lips, French kiss my worries all away/There must be a sweeter place/We can sugarcoat the taste.”

“Vulnerable ain’t easy, believe me, but I go there,” Gomez proclaims near the beginning of Rare. Maybe so. But it’s difficult to come away from Rare with any real perspective on who Gomez is other than that she doesn’t want to be the person she was, whoever that similarly mysterious shadow was. Unfortunately for pop stars everywhere, exposing your soul does not equal examining it. Gomez tries, but never quite succeeds at doing either here. Her introspection can only go so deep when it’s paired with sleek, easy songwriting that lets her slip by, just another specter.


Buy: Rough Trade

(Pitchfork may earn a commission from purchases made through affiliate links on our site.)

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiN2h0dHBzOi8vcGl0Y2hmb3JrLmNvbS9yZXZpZXdzL2FsYnVtcy9zZWxlbmEtZ29tZXotcmFyZS_SATtodHRwczovL3BpdGNoZm9yay5jb20vcmV2aWV3cy9hbGJ1bXMvc2VsZW5hLWdvbWV6LXJhcmUvYW1wLw?oc=5

2020-01-14 06:00:00Z
52780550596307

Senin, 13 Januari 2020

Watch The Oscar Nominations Live Stream - Deadline

The 92nd Oscar nominations are being announced this morning beginning at 8:18 AM ET/5:18 AM PT. Nominees in all 24 categories highlighting the year’s best in film will be revealed in a global live presentation by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

You can watch the nominations above and stay with Deadline all day for news, analysis and more.

The Academy will also stream this morning’s noms on Oscar.com, Oscars.org and its digital platforms on Twitter, YouTube and Facebook. Follow along with the hashtags #OscarNoms and #Oscars.

The noms will be rolled out in two parts, beginning at 5:18 PT with the following nine categories (in no particular order): Actor in a Supporting Role, Actress in a Supporting Role, Costume Design, Film Editing, Original Score, Animated Short Film, Live Action Short Film, Sound Editing and Sound Mixing.

After a break, the remainder of the categories will be announced at 5:30 AM PT (in no particular order): Actor in a Leading Role, Actress in a Leading Role, Animated Feature Film, Cinematography, Directing, Documentary Feature, Documentary Short Subject, International Feature Film, Makeup and Hairstyling, Original Song, Best Picture, Production Design, Visual Effects, Adapted Screenplay and Original Screenplay.

Among the films expected to be in the mix this morning as the awards race hits high gear: Universal’s World War I epic 1917, Netflix’s Martin Scorsese pic The Irishman and Noah Baumbach’s Marriage Story, Sony’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood from Quentin Tarantino and Little Women from Greta Gerwig, Fox Searchlight’s Jojo Rabbit, 20th Century Fox’s Ford v Ferrari, Warner Bros’ Joker and Bong Joon Ho’s Korean pic Parasite from Neon which has a shot at crossing over from the International Feature race where it is a favorite.

After today’s noms are unveiled, final Oscar voting kicks off January 30 and ends February 4 at 5 PM PT. The once-again-hostless 92nd Academy Awards are February 9 at the Dolby Theater at Hollywood & Highland.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vZGVhZGxpbmUuY29tLzIwMjAvMDEvd2F0Y2gtMjAyMC1vc2Nhci1ub21pbmF0aW9ucy1saXZlLXN0cmVhbS1hY2FkZW15LWF3YXJkcy1hbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQtMTIwMjgyNjQ2Ny_SAXFodHRwczovL2RlYWRsaW5lLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxL3dhdGNoLTIwMjAtb3NjYXItbm9taW5hdGlvbnMtbGl2ZS1zdHJlYW0tYWNhZGVteS1hd2FyZHMtYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50LTEyMDI4MjY0NjcvYW1wLw?oc=5

2020-01-13 13:09:00Z
52780549876700

Prince Harry and Prince William say bullying story is false - CNN

In a joint statement sent to CNN, spokespeople for the Duke of Sussex and the Duke of Cambridge said: "Despite clear denials, a false story ran in a UK newspaper today speculating about the relationship between the Duke of Sussex and the Duke of Cambridge."
A royal showdown at Sandringham looms over Harry and Meghan's decision to go it alone
"For brothers who care so deeply about the issues surrounding mental health, the use of inflammatory language in this way is offensive and potentially harmful," the statement said.
It followed a story in the Times of London on Monday, reporting that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Meghan and Harry, felt "pushed away" by William's "bullying attitude."
The article suggested the brothers "fell out because William wasn't friendly towards Meghan" and that the Sussexes were "constantly being bullied."
Harry and Meghan shocked the world and "disappointed" the rest of the royal family last week when they announced they would be scaling back their official duties to pursue their private interests.
Why does Meghan get all the blame?
They added that they wanted to work towards becoming financially independent.
Royal sources have told CNN it wasn't the decision itself but the timing of their announcement that left senior members of the family feeling hurt.
Queen Elizabeth II, Harry's grandmother, had expressly asked the prince to hold off releasing any statements regarding the couple's future, CNN understands.
The royal family is set to hold a summit Monday to discuss Harry and Meghan's future, a palace source told CNN on Saturday.
The Queen, Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry will all attend the meeting at Sandringham, the Queen's country estate in rural Norfolk, about 100 miles north of London.
Meghan, who has returned to Canada -- where the couple and their baby son Archie spent the Christmas holidays -- is expected to call in. It's unclear when she will return to the UK.
Harry and Meghan's decision to walk away has given the Queen a royal headache
The summit will be the first time the senior royals have met since the Sussexes made their announcement on Wednesday.
In spite of the way it has unfolded, the couple's decision to step back from senior royal duties is not that surprising. While it may have come as something of a bombshell to casual observers, the writing had been on the wall for some time.
Harry and Meghan have both spoken previously about the toll public scrutiny has taken on them. Harry also flagged up the possibility of living abroad during the couple's controversial TV documentary, which aired in October.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8xMy91ay9wcmluY2UtaGFycnktcHJpbmNlLXdpbGxpYW0tYnVsbHlpbmctc3RhdGVtZW50LWludGwvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBZGh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmNubi5jb20vY25uLzIwMjAvMDEvMTMvdWsvcHJpbmNlLWhhcnJ5LXByaW5jZS13aWxsaWFtLWJ1bGx5aW5nLXN0YXRlbWVudC1pbnRsL2luZGV4Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-01-13 12:38:00Z
52780542675596

Prince Harry and Prince William say bullying story is false - CNN

In a joint statement sent to CNN, spokespeople for the Duke of Sussex and the Duke of Cambridge said: "Despite clear denials, a false story ran in a UK newspaper today speculating about the relationship between the Duke of Sussex and the Duke of Cambridge."
A royal showdown at Sandringham looms over Harry and Meghan's decision to go it alone
"For brothers who care so deeply about the issues surrounding mental health, the use of inflammatory language in this way is offensive and potentially harmful," the statement said.
It followed a story in the Times of London on Monday, reporting that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Meghan and Harry, felt "pushed away" by William's "bullying attitude."
The article suggested the brothers "fell out because William wasn't friendly towards Meghan" and that the Sussexes were "constantly being bullied."
Harry and Meghan shocked the world and "disappointed" the rest of the royal family last week when they announced they would be scaling back their official duties to pursue their private interests.
Why does Meghan get all the blame?
They added that they wanted to work towards becoming financially independent.
Royal sources have told CNN it wasn't the decision itself but the timing of their announcement that left senior members of the family feeling hurt.
Queen Elizabeth II, Harry's grandmother, had expressly asked the prince to hold off releasing any statements regarding the couple's future, CNN understands.
The royal family is set to hold a summit Monday to discuss Harry and Meghan's future, a palace source told CNN on Saturday.
The Queen, Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry will all attend the meeting at Sandringham, the Queen's country estate in rural Norfolk, about 100 miles north of London.
Meghan, who has returned to Canada -- where the couple and their baby son Archie spent the Christmas holidays -- is expected to call in. It's unclear when she will return to the UK.
Harry and Meghan's decision to walk away has given the Queen a royal headache
The summit will be the first time the senior royals have met since the Sussexes made their announcement on Wednesday.
In spite of the way it has unfolded, the couple's decision to step back from senior royal duties is not that surprising. While it may have come as something of a bombshell to casual observers, the writing had been on the wall for some time.
Harry and Meghan have both spoken previously about the toll public scrutiny has taken on them. Harry also flagged up the possibility of living abroad during the couple's controversial TV documentary, which aired in October.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8xMy91ay9wcmluY2UtaGFycnktcHJpbmNlLXdpbGxpYW0tYnVsbHlpbmctc3RhdGVtZW50LWludGwvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBZGh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmNubi5jb20vY25uLzIwMjAvMDEvMTMvdWsvcHJpbmNlLWhhcnJ5LXByaW5jZS13aWxsaWFtLWJ1bGx5aW5nLXN0YXRlbWVudC1pbnRsL2luZGV4Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-01-13 12:17:00Z
52780542675596